Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In patch-79, it seems that you introduce THE > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Is it ok? > > Revision: xtla--main--0.1--patch-79 > Archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Creator: Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...] >> New-patches: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hrm. I'm not totally sure. I created patch-79 with the following steps: * tla get xtla--main--0.1--patch-78 * tla replay --reverse xtla--main--0.1--patch-77 * tla sync-tree xtla--main--0.1--patch-77 # (to grab the patch log) * tla commit ... It looks like the patch logs for xtla--jet--0.0--patch-147 and 148 were grabbed by the sync-tree. Anyone know if this is likely to cause problems? (or what to do about them? :o) Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
