On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 14:43:57, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > > Maybe we should: tla mv docs/BINDINGS xtla-bindings.el to > > have them all at one place (separate interface from > > implementation) and and remove all corresponding binding > > code from xtal.el! > > At least for developers, till releasing xtla.el 0.1, 0.99 or 1.0, > it is useful. You can merge xtla-*.el into one when releasing.
Why merging when XEmacs has a package management system? Merging into one big file is evil, as users which might fix a bug in it are not able to send a suitable patch back to us. > Stefan, do you have strong objection? > > BTW, we will have the same situation about font-lock's face. > About face definition, there is no strong rules; however, it > is better to have single common policy. Therefore the file > name should be xtla-defs.el instead of xtla-bindings.el, I > think. Good point. Robert
