Quoting Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suppose the least painful way to do it would be to add a new function > that will ultimately replace tla-run-arch and gradually change the > commands over to using that instead? I'll add a note to HACKING > explaining the whole thing. I suggest you add a tla--run-tla function to tla-core.el that will replace tla--run-arch gradually. Just a thought : synchronous and asynchronous processes are now managed really differently. Wouldn't it be worth having two different functions? tla--run-tla-synchron tla--run-tla-asynchron ? -- Matthieu ------------------------------------------------- envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !
