Matthieu MOY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> I suppose the least painful way to do it would be to add a new function >> that will ultimately replace tla-run-arch and gradually change the >> commands over to using that instead? I'll add a note to HACKING >> explaining the whole thing. > > I suggest you add a tla--run-tla function to tla-core.el that will replace > tla--run-arch gradually.
Thats a good idea! > Just a thought : synchronous and asynchronous processes are now managed really > differently. Wouldn't it be worth having two different functions? > > tla--run-tla-synchron > tla--run-tla-asynchron Let's do it that way. -- Stefan.
