On 8/23/07, Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > out of curiosity is that an archive you created for this test or actually > occured in day to day work? > Actually do not answer, I know it's the former. Artificial benchmarks.
Artificial words! > you need to actually care about xubuntu more than xarchiver. Tough choice I > know. > A prove of that would be for you to send patches that optimize file-roller > until it > is as fast as you could get xarchiver. Unlikely. So why do you speak? Just for replying? Jani, Jani. > No, I am saying it because your tone is inappropriate and not constructive. > I understand, it is about your app(s), but admit it then. My tone? is it not yours? > Q: If file-roller didn ot have gnome deps would you still oppose the switch? I'm opposing to ANY gnome lib based apps, File-roller is one of them. Why should GNOME apps be included in Xubuntu if there are a bunch of them included in Ubuntu? Why should users use Xubuntu if all of its apps are already included in Ubuntu? Because of XFCE? You are transforming Xubuntu in a bloated copy of Ubuntu and you are so stubborn not to understand this. -- Colossus Xarchiver, a Linux GTK+2 only archive manager - http://xarchiver.xfce.org -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
