On 8/23/07, Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Q: If file-roller didn ot have gnome deps would you still oppose the > switch? > > > > I'm opposing to ANY gnome lib based apps, File-roller is one of them. > > Reread the question. > > Jani > > > -- > xubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel >
Wow, this is turning into a big mud-slinging free-for-all. Are Jani and Guiseppe the only two people subscribed to this list? Seems that way sometimes. Xarchiver has its issues, but if it's really so bad, then why do most Xfce-based distros package it by default? Even Zenwalk, which has a rather high standard when it comes to packaging apps by default, packages Xarchiver by default. >From a quick search on the Ubuntu forums, it doesn't seem like many people have problems with Xarchiver. I really don't think it's as bad as Jani claims. By the same token, obviously Guiseppe needs to be open to bug reports and usability suggestions. He's obviously still working on Xarchiver, so hopefully improvements are forthcoming. Just my $0.02. Ghostvirus
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
