Friends,
I like Xubuntu with pure XFCE.
Xubuntu is as pure as Debian with XFCE with the advantage of being an
Ubuntu flavor
I think Xubuntu perfect the way it is
Thanks
Jack Pogorelsky Junior
Mechanical Engineer
Tel: +55 (51) 9348-0140
Site: sulmail.com/pogorelsky
E-mail: [email protected]
Em 22/08/2016 16:28, Mark F escreveu:
I'm a new Xubuntu user. I've been using Lubuntu for over a year. I saw
this topic in the mailing-list archives and thought this post
(questions, observations) might be welcome here. I think it ties into
marketing?
I looked at Mint Xfce and, to be honest, I like it *much* more. The
only reason I went with Xubuntu is the larger community of support
(Ubuntu's forums). I'd rather try to make Xubuntu better than to
contribute to a fork.
What I'm wondering is whether you guys ever evaluate Mint Xfce and
consider evolving the desktop in that direction? Is it ever even
discussed? (Is there a way to find a past discussion like that in the
mailing-list archive?).
For example:
- Wisker menu progresses right to left (categories are on right open
to reveal contents on the left). Using MintX, right-to-left stood out
to me immediately as more intuitive.
- Right/left clicking on taskbar entries seems unintuitive to me. It
seems like left clicks are passed through the applet and into the
underlying taskbar. (Right clicks access the applet's options?). MintX
seems to have addressed this. It works differently.
- Wisker menu's categories automatically reveal content by mousing
over each one. (No click required).
- How is inclusion into Wisker's "Settings" and "System" chosen? It's
like everything is in Settings. I'm not sure I could differentiate
between those two categories. But, it seems like no differentiation is
occuring. (But, it is because two items are in "System.").
- A lot of things seem unintuitive to me. What's called "[Distro]
Software Center" in other distros is just "Software" in Xubuntu. It's
in the "Favorites" category, not in "System" nor "Settings."
- The "Software" tool seems very slow and uninformative compared to
Lubuntu's "Software Center" (And MintX's). I tried to install
Keepass2, which was available in Lubutu's software center. It's not in
Xubuntu's.
- I found a Keepass package, but it made me authenticate with my
Ubuntu single-signon. It wouldn't authenticate me, giving a
repeated error (even though I can login to the Ubuntu One site). I
like the goal behind this. But, it's a free package. I shouldn't
have to go through these hurdles. It's a *big* problem if I can't
access my passwords in a new install.
- Menu bar on top. Not easy to figure out how to put it on the bottom.
Not "mainstream" if you're trying to appeal to new users (familiar
with Windows)?
So, I'm just wondering (in terms of marketing, appealing to more
users), has this topic ever come up before? Evaluating what draws
people to other Xfce environments? What the others are doing right?
Why they chose to fork (and duplicate efforts)? Would it make sense to
solicit surveys (instead of testimonials)?
I hope this doesn't sound like I'm complaining. I understand no
desktop will meet everyone's needs. But, this thread implies outreach,
seeking to gain popularity. MintX seems more popular (according to
distrowatch?). I'm just wondering if this discussion has ever
occurred? (I.e., should Xubuntu try to incorporate any of MintX's
features?).
Is it possible to install MintX's desktop in Xubuntu? Would it make
sense to offer that desktop more clearly (or a desktop made
specifically to be more like MintX, so people who might choose that
distro could more easily choose Xubuntu?).
Again, I hope I'm not causing a problem. This topic seemed to be about
advocacy, increasing relevancy. Since I've just been comparing Xfce
desktops, the topic of "why is Xubuntu's desktop the way it is?"
seemed like a natural question. It makes me wonder if anyone has gone
back to "square one" and questioned everything. (When I see everything
lumped into "Settings," I get the impression that discussion hasn't
occured. The desktop is just an evolution and hasn't been re-thought
from the ground up?).
I look forward to reading responses. I just feel like something is
missing. Ubuntu has the support and immediacy of security patches.
But, Mint has the appeal to new users (IMO). I just wonder if anyone
has tried to bridge that gap.
Thanks!
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
