Ok, thank you very much Flocculant ;) 2016-05-26 16:57 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > On 26/05/16 14:53, Florian Coste wrote: > > Hi, > > 2016-05-26 10:53 GMT+02:00 JMZ <[email protected]>: > > 5) If a ppa website says that it explicitly supports yakkety, you're > probably okay with the ppa signature you have now. If not, you'll have to > run the new signature with 'add-apt-repository' and generate new > source.list.d files. > > Have you ever seen a ppa which supports already the next stable > version before it's released ? > > You'll find that the ones that *we* care about will when necessary, at this > time all of our dev ppa's are yakkety ready. > > Why don't use the daily iso built from the devel version ? Why do you > think it's not easier ? > > By the way, I think I should be ready to have a dual-boot with the > actual stable version (Xenial) and with the next release (Yakkety). I > should be ready to use everday the devel version, and come back to > Xenial if something is wrong. But, I have a question, how to deal with > ppa ? As I said, I think it's hard to find ppa which support the devel > version, so, if I need a ppa for my personal work (which support only > stable version), how can I do in order to use it in the devel version > ? > > Thanks > Florian > > Often I've managed to run 'supported' ppa with 'dev' release - just change > where it's pointing e.g. if you add a ppa and it's good for xenial and > previous but not yakkety - edit the source file to say xenial. Won't always > work - but worth trying. I have to do that with clementine dev version from > ppa. > > -- > Xubuntu QA > > > -- > xubuntu-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users >
-- xubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users
