> I've had Natamar 0.4-b96 for a few weeks now. Some thoughts:
> 1. Xserver 1.5.1/Mesa 7.2

For the 100th time: Guess what the X11 group is working on for x86, and what is 
still broken on SPARC. I thought I had described the problem already ...

> 2. Xsun driver framework layer for Xorg compatibility (or just XSun
> backup)

Is this a joke, especially w/o the Xsun src, but even with?!
And #2: Okay, I will decide that Xsun is redistributable from now on. The 
X11-emancipation Xorg work of the last 2.5 years was only for fun. From now on 
I will ship my distro with Xsun ...
Maybe I will run the "reverse-engineering-compiler" over it in a hurry and 
bundle its src with it.
(irony)

> 3. A 'possible' closed-source redistributable Sun OpenGL 1.5
First, what do I have to do with this. Secondly: I don't like closed src stuff, 
as re-iterated previously. #3.) I'm not sure if Sun's Implementation of the SGI 
OpenGL standard is still being maintained. I would doubt it. #4.) Mesa should 
have more upstream development nowadays ..., and more functions and better 
algorithms and higher performance.

> 4. iceWm 1.2.36
Right, very important to always have the highest number.
Although this fix will indeed be quick, thanks to Alan Coopersmith's Makefiles 
system.
So if you find *this* important, ok.

> This could allow us to support and test the XVR-600/1200/2500 device
> drivers on the Natamar distro. Maybe... ?

The console drivers are on the live cd and the frame buffer rc scripts and 
drivers are active. If you nfs-mount /usr/openwin then it should be trivial to 
start Xsun on top of Natamar. When the hdd-installable version is available, 
folks are free to add Xsun pkgadd packages from any SPARC-Solaris install-media 
by themselves. BUT I CANNOT SHIP THEM.
That was the reason why I ever started wasting what I once had (past tense) 
into SPARC-Xorg.

--
Martin Bochnig

> ~ Ken Mays

Reply via email to