Moinak Ghosh wrote: > Martin Bochnig wrote: >> Moinak Ghosh wrote: >>> I was going through the diffs you sent to indiana-discuss. They >>> are quite huge >>> and should be merged in one module at a time. >> >> >> You mean I shall invest a month of time into destroying a 99.98% >> working entity? >> I have repeatedly requested a single technical reason that would >> justify doing so. >> >> >>> I was seeing diffs like the following: >>> >>> Binary files >>> ./fox-gate__AlanMercurDefault20070901sat1153hCEST/./.hg/store/00changelog.i >>> and >>> ./XXX__fox-gate__Alan20070901__Moinak20070501__Martin20071012__x64_x86_sparc/./.hg/store/00changelog.i >>> >>> differ >>> >>> >>> This seems kinda weird. You probably need to sync up you hg workspace. >> >> You probably first need to read the filename: >> --->> fox-gate__Alan20070901__Moinak20070501__Martin20071012 <<--- >> >> and, at the minimum, my message that came along with it. >> I *had* to leave, I almost didn't even catch my plane anymore (!!!). >> >>> >>> Also I noticed that you are using the older diffs for the >>> open-src/apps directory. >>> I have spent some time updating those to the latest versions. So in >>> fact it will >>> make you job easier if I commit my changes to open-src/apps first. >>> >>> You just need to execute hg pull and hg update and mercurial should >>> merge in the >>> apps changes nicely. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Moinak. >> >> >> I am somewhat surprised by your conclusions. >> No comment otherwise. >> > > Since you so evidently feel that my suggestions will destroy your > months of hard work,
??? The difference is how I create my pkgdefs, versus how you have created yours. Mine are all hand-edited, not just the plain unmodified output generated by "*find . -print | pkgproto > prototype" in half a second. *And my packages fully integrate into Alan Coopersmith's and Jay Cotton's excellent framework and can be created without dirtily adding options to /usr/bin/pkgmk, worse: Adding custom buildscripts. > please feel free to commit your changes in the manner that you think > is appropriate. I > will not commit anything till you are done. > > Regards, > Moinak. > #0.) You miss the points (yes, the technical points) #1.) You didn't provide a reason, yet another time (is it for your incremental builds, as suggested by your [unnecessary] temporary removal of "-k" from the build-script?). Why do you use that buildscript at all, during your testing phase? #2.) Feel free to push your diffs, I won't. Regards, Martin.
