It is a good software with high scalability. Mostly used for geomechanical tasks by Brisbane University in Australia. It uses MPI-schema, what is excellent for clusters.
Exceptionally for me, there are 1 bug ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/esys-particle/+bug/442881) and 1 unimplemented feature, which keep me out of using it. Anyway, it is good when you have 2 or more opportunity to choose between software. https://launchpad.net/esys-particle ______________________________ Anton Gladkyy 2010/1/18 Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]> > > But there are some bugs which are not allow me to use ESyS for my tasks. >> > Could you tell more about the "bugs" in ESyS? I'm interested in that. > I feel like some codes are perfect on the paper but fail when somebody > wants to actually do something with them, partly due to academic gaps or > intrinsic differences between computer science / engineering science, > physics of particles / geomechanics, fluid mechanics / solid mechanics, > dynamic flow / quasi-static deformation, etc. > In this perspective, Yade has the advantage of being developped by people > using it for research (balance that with drawbacks in terms of developpement > speed and consistency of the design). Two exceptions are Olivier Galizzi > and Alban Daumer. > > Bruno > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
