There is a possibility that one day we can have a flag for different integration methods.
Yours, Boon ---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:19:17 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Yade-dev] NewtonIntegrator::exactAsphericalRot > > >> I just had the idea that we could selectively call >> leapfrogSphericalRotate for bodies that have >> inertia[0]==inertia[1]==interia[2] and leapfrogAsphericalRotate for the >> rest; the exactAsphericalRot could be removed then. >> >> The impact should be negligible and all non-spherical bodies would be >> moved "exactly" without changing any options. >> >> > > Hi, it sounds correct. Though, I'm not opposed but I'm always a bit > afraid of introducing additional operations when they are not strictly > necessary. The DEM algorithm is quite simple in itself. In one sense, > adding negligible costs here and there to something that is itself > negligible will result in a "significant" impact. But as long as people > include the negligible stuff one by one, nobody will never notice, we > could just end with a slow code, with no idea were to look for > optimizations. I'm wondering. > > > Bruno > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _________________________________________________________________ Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
