Thank you for encouraging words Anton. :-)
Keep in mind that we 1) discussed this design question (not enough it
seems) face to face with Vaclav, and 2) the possible bugs most probably
come from changes in ScGeom which ARE really necessary, not from class
hierarchy changes, and 3) ScGeom+Facet is broken anyway...
Bruno
, and 2/ I still didn't see the .
On 15/07/10 16:57, Anton Gladky wrote:
Bruno, sorry, we are all, probably, too strict to you today,
but you should understand, that we all are working on the same software.
It is not good to brake somebody's code or scripts etc if it is not
really necessary.
We should negotiate on very serious questions on designing code, class
hierarchy etc.
And, of course, testing required to escape bugs! It is very difficult
then to find those bugs, you can spend hours with no result.
I hope for next good cooperation and thanks for contribution!
______________________________
Anton Gladkyy
2010/7/15 Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Your code is broken Jerome, I don't know why it worked before.
You didn't declare goRevert.
Mmmmh... too fast maybe. Forget it.
B.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
Post to : [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
