On 15 July 2010 21:27, Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> You said once that you were using updateShear=true. It was actually the > only reason to keep shear and updateShear in this WT* 2365 commit. ;-) > Oh sorry, maybe I said I was testing it because I wanted to know if it was giving the right result. You can get rid of it. ATM the only place where I see that function in use is the ElasticContactLaw. Anyway it is a repetition of what could be done with rotate() function and shearIncrement() functions (I hope you will manage to replace them in ScGeom as it looked good choice to me). > > If somebody need it again, he can derive an Ig containing shear, and update > it with ScGeom::rotate(shear), as you say. Yes, sure. Bye. Chiara
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
