Hi, I personally use voro++. I think it is more appropriate (simple) if you only need the cells with circumcenter-vertices (instead of particle-center-vertices). In voro++ there is not iterator to loop over edges, faces or something else. Instead, you need to know the internal structure.
The voronoicell_base class is a template class with neighbor_track option. Nevertheless, I think (not sure) that only connectivity informations are stored but nothing about tetrahedrons. Vincent Le 29 oct. 2010 à 17:18, Bruno Chareyre a écrit : > Thanks for suggestion Vaclav. I've been looking a little, but it needs more > time to understand how to use it. Fluid coupling needs iterations on > tetrahedra of the triangulation, and they don't seem to be explicitely > defined in Voro++. > Sergei, why "faster"? Did you compare CPU times with CGAL? > > Bruno > > > >> >>> >>> I stumbled accross http://math.lbl.gov/voro++/examples/radical/ (what >>> they call "radical" is what you call "weighted"). Perhaps it could be >>> useful for Ema with the periodic tringulation which CGAL does not >>> handle. Note that the code was produced for analyzing particle flows >>> (with LAMMMS). >>> >>> Cheers, Vaclav >> >> Hm, I use this lib too (though, at the moment without a periodicity and >> weights). It is very good: simple and fast (as opposed to CGAL)... >> > > > -- > _______________ > Bruno Chareyre > Associate Professor > ENSE³ - Grenoble INP > Lab. 3SR > BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France > Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21 > Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43 > ________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
