Hi Christian, thank you for the confirmation and the figures. Could you please comment them a little, so that I get the problem they show ? In fact, I would deduce from them that there is a problem for Pc* < 1000, where the water volume starts to decrease when suction decreases, whereas I would wait for continuous increase of the water volume (= saturation ratio) in this case..
And I was not aware there could be problem with getCapillaryStress : as for me, I can use it without problems.. ________________________________________ From: Yade-dev [[email protected]] on behalf of Christian Jakob [[email protected]] Sent: November 13, 2014 5:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Yade-dev] Some cleaning in capillary law : data files validity Hi, I followed your discussion on capillary law and I can confirm, that the meniscii volume is not correct for a suction higher than 1500. In my simulations I reduce suction from 5000 to 0 and erase liquid bridges from bottom to top of the model (see attachment). The calculation of forces seems to be uneffected (see sum of cap. forces). Thanks for spoting this! Christian btw, getCapillaryStress() is still not working (see file)... Zitat von Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]>: > On 10/11/14 20:00, Jerome Duriez wrote: >> Ok. I'm getting zero water volume for contacting spheres for an >> adimensionned capillary pressure Pc* = 1500 +/- 5 (the minimum >> adimensionned water volume seems to be ~ 2.6e-6) >> > Great. It means that 1500 was probably the max value when generating the > data files. > There could be a warning in the code if Pc*>=1500, but it is only > relevant for a specific set of data files... > The max should be defined automatically when reading the data. > > B > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
