2010/5/13 chiara modenese <[email protected]>
> > > It is a "feature" that I recall now. If you set timestep via O.dt, it >> will disable timesteppers (otherwise the change would be only effective >> until the next run of the timestepper). You can re-eanble timesteppers >> with >> >> http://beta.arcig.cz/~eudoxos/yade/sphinx/yade.wrapper.html#yade.wrapper.Omega.usesTimeStepper<http://beta.arcig.cz/%7Eeudoxos/yade/sphinx/yade.wrapper.html#yade.wrapper.Omega.usesTimeStepper>. >> > Ok, thanks. > > >> >> Not very logical, as I see now (and not documented either). I would >> change it as follows: if you set O.dt to a non-positive value, then >> timestepper will be enabled (and exception raised if there not one). If >> you set O.dt to a positive value, timestepper will be disabled. Does >> that sound better? >> > Yes, it sounds at least more logical. Otherwise, if not directly reading > the code, one can only guess what happens. I would add documentation on this > somewhere for the future. > > Thanks, Chia > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users> >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : >> https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
