> Not very logical, as I see now (and not documented either). I would > change it as follows: if you set O.dt to a non-positive value, then > timestepper will be enabled (and exception raised if there not one). If > you set O.dt to a positive value, timestepper will be disabled. Does > that sound better? > > O.usesTimeStepper will then be redundant.
Present for you in r2222 :-) Now you do O.dt=.5*utils.PWaveTimeStep(); # sets the timestep O.dt=-1 # disables timestepper Not that it looks that much better.. Yet another option is 1. if O.dt is assigned negative value, then set O.dt=|Δt| (so that it is positive) *and* enable TimeStepper 2. if O.dt is assigned a positive value, then O.dt=Δt *and* disable TimeStepper. Is that more logical? Then you would just write O.dt=-.5*utils.PWaveTimeStep() v. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
