2010/5/13 Václav Šmilauer <[email protected]> > > Not very logical, as I see now (and not documented either). I would > > change it as follows: if you set O.dt to a non-positive value, then > > timestepper will be enabled (and exception raised if there not one). If > > you set O.dt to a positive value, timestepper will be disabled. Does > > that sound better? > > > > O.usesTimeStepper will then be redundant. > > Present for you in r2222 :-) > Oh very kind :-)
> > Now you do > > O.dt=.5*utils.PWaveTimeStep(); # sets the timestep > O.dt=-1 # disables timestepper > > Not that it looks that much better.. > In fact... I would opt for the option below, still a way to go around though. But maybe there are not too many solutions if one wants to use both o.dt and TS. Chia > > > Yet another option is > > 1. if O.dt is assigned negative value, then set O.dt=|Δt| (so that it is > positive) *and* enable TimeStepper > > 2. if O.dt is assigned a positive value, then O.dt=Δt *and* disable > TimeStepper. > > Is that more logical? Then you would just write > > O.dt=-.5*utils.PWaveTimeStep() > > v. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
