On 27/Jul/11 18:12, John C Klensin wrote: > >> draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation? > > I'm not sure what you are asking, since that document isn't > going anywhere [...]
Does that mean it will just get lost in oblivion? > At the risk of being a little impolite, give me credit for > having a bit of a clue and for caring enough about 5321 that I'm > not going to open it without planning to do a competent job. Don't mention it, I certainly do. However, that document contains knowledge that will not be properly available for a long time, if yam is shut down so abruptly as to not even complete half-baked work. If that's the fate of yam, I'd rather publish the pre-evaluation document as-is (much like what was done with RFC 5672.) jm2c _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
