--On Saturday, May 24, 2014 12:08 -0700 Randall Gellens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Consider the work to add the clarifications as a down payment > on the work of any eventual revision, or insurance that a > revision will be done without forgetting this discussion now. > Or, if it's worth publishing the errata, it's worth noting > that it isn't quite right. Wfm, noting however that, in my role as keeper of the XML with comments, etc., I've already marked this change --with a note that the text isn't quite right-- into the source that would be used to build 6409bis if Randy and I were to do it. My previous note was written with that in mind. john _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
