*** ACTION FOR RFC EDITOR ***

>>>  OK... then please agree on an exact wording change to the
>>>  errata report, and I will get the change made.
>>
>>  If Randy has strong preferences to the contrary and wants to
>>  take the lead to sort out wording, I'll defer to him.   But my
>>  preference right now, based on avoidance of pointless work,
>>  would just be to add a sentence to what is in the erratum
>>  already that says "the above wording is not quite correct and
>>  needs to be examined carefully before a revised version is
>>  inserted into a revised document" ... or something to that
>>  effect - exact wording doesn't make any difference.  In other
>>  words, I recommend flagging this rather than trying to develop
>>  supposedly-final text that would just need another pass if/when
>>  the document is revised.
>
> WFM.

OK... then:

RFC Editor: Please return this errata report to "Reported" state so I
can make the changes.  Thanks.

Barry

_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam

Reply via email to