Hey Milind, I think it should be up to the people working on it - if they want to maintain it in github they should, if they want to contribute it to Yarn they should. I think we've found it useful to have libhdfs maintained in-tree for hdfs (allows us to update/release changes that introduce new APIs in one shot), OTOH now that we've got maintained PB APIs you can more realistically maintain language bindings out of tree. Either path seems reasonable to me.
Thanks, Eli On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Milind Bhandarkar < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Folks, > > > > I had sent a proposal for contributing libyarn, a native C interface for > Yarn RM (Client-RM, AM-RM) last week. > > > > I guess some of you were busy in the 2.2 GA, so did not have time to reply. > > > > Now that 2.2 is GA, can you comment on whether libyarn belongs to Apache > YARN or should it be hosted as an addendum elsewhere ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Milind > > - >
