On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Milind Bhandarkar < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your input, Eli. > > Since you mention libhdfs, now that hdfs PB protocols have stabilized, for > quite some time, would folks think that a native C binding for hdfs belongs > outside of HDFS? I think libyarn decision should be based on similar > feeling too. > > It would be incompatible to remove it, and it's actively maintained in-tree by the same people who work on hdfs so I don't see why we'd want to remove it. Again, the decision should be made by the community of people working on libhdfs. Ditto libyarn, if they want to contribute the code to Yarn why don't they do so?
