Milind, one thing to keep in mind, if I got previous discussions right, is that the API stability in Hadoop 2 it does not include PB protocols yet but client APIs.
Cheers. On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eli Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Milind Bhandarkar < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for your input, Eli. > > > > Since you mention libhdfs, now that hdfs PB protocols have stabilized, > for > > quite some time, would folks think that a native C binding for hdfs > belongs > > outside of HDFS? I think libyarn decision should be based on similar > > feeling too. > > > > > It would be incompatible to remove it, and it's actively maintained in-tree > by the same people who work on hdfs so I don't see why we'd want to remove > it. Again, the decision should be made by the community of people working > on libhdfs. > > Ditto libyarn, if they want to contribute the code to Yarn why don't they > do so? > -- Alejandro
