+1, IMO, it's okay remove. I've not heard that it's used in production.
Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ravi Prakash <ravihad...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Even though I committed it, I admit we haven't done a good job of > maintaining the alpha code. > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> I ll go ahead and commit the patch end of this week if I don't hear any >> reservations either here or on the JIRA. >> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Based on the lack of response, can I assume lack of interest in >> > DockerContainerExecutor and hence agreement with its removal? >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi folks >> >> >> >> I am emailing here to bring attention to YARN-5388 that proposes to >> >> deprecate DockerContainerExecutor (DCE) in 2.x and its removal in 3.0. >> >> >> >> DCE was released in 2.6. Since then, the LinuxContainerExecutor has been >> >> augmented to support Docker containers alongside non-Docker ones. Given >> the >> >> duplication and maturity of the latter, the proposal is to deprecate >> DCE in >> >> 2.x and remove it in 3.0. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
