Apologies for the late response, Karthik. +1 on removing it. Especially given all the work going on related to YARN-3611.
-Sidharta. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, > > IMO, it's okay remove. I've not heard that it's used in production. > > Thanks, > - Tsuyoshi > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ravi Prakash <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1. Even though I committed it, I admit we haven't done a good job of > > maintaining the alpha code. > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I ll go ahead and commit the patch end of this week if I don't hear any > >> reservations either here or on the JIRA. > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Based on the lack of response, can I assume lack of interest in > >> > DockerContainerExecutor and hence agreement with its removal? > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Karthik Kambatla <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi folks > >> >> > >> >> I am emailing here to bring attention to YARN-5388 that proposes to > >> >> deprecate DockerContainerExecutor (DCE) in 2.x and its removal in > 3.0. > >> >> > >> >> DCE was released in 2.6. Since then, the LinuxContainerExecutor has > been > >> >> augmented to support Docker containers alongside non-Docker ones. > Given > >> the > >> >> duplication and maturity of the latter, the proposal is to deprecate > >> DCE in > >> >> 2.x and remove it in 3.0. > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
