Eric, thanks for updating your vote! I just committed YARN-7338

Vrushali:

Since the YARN-7364 is an issue needs to be fixed in trunk/branch-3.0, I'm
preferred to merge all existing JIRAs to branch-2 first and backport
YARN-7364 separately.

Thanks,
Wangda


On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 on merge when YARN-7338 is resolved.
>
> On 10/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Eric Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Thank you
>
>     Regards,
>     Eric
>
>     From: Vrushali C <[email protected]>
>     Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM
>     To: Eric Yang <[email protected]>
>     Cc: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]>, Sunil G <
> [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>, Wangda Tan <[email protected]>
>     Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk
>
>     Thanks Eric, I have filed https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/YARN-7338 to track this.
>
>     On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>     -1 (binding).
>
>     Ui2 does not seem to support same origin policy for cross site
> scripting prevention.
>     The following parameters has no effect for /ui2:
>
>     hadoop.http.cross-origin.enabled = true
>     yarn.resourcemanager.webapp.cross-origin.enabled = true
>
>     This is because ui2 is designed as a separate web application.
> WebFilters setup for existing resource manager doesn’t apply to the new web
> application.
>     Please open JIRA to track the security issue and resolve the problem
> prior to backporting this to branch-2.
>     This would minimize the risk to open up security hole in branch-2.
>
>     Thank you
>
>     Regards,
>     Eric
>
>     On 10/16/17, 1:03 PM, "Vrushali C" <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         We are planning to include the new YARN UI as part of 2.9
> release.  There
>         is work in progress for back-porting the UI to branch2.
>
>         Details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7169.
>
>
>
>         On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rohith Sharma K S <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>         > wrote:
>
>         > I just noticed that my voted mail has been sent to Wangda and
> forgotten to
>         > keep yarn-dev in cc. Its my bad:-(  I am forwarding my voted
> mail to
>         > yarn-dev.
>         >
>         > Thanks & Regards
>         > Rohith Sharma K S
>         >
>         >
>         > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>         > From: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>>
>         > Date: 3 November 2016 at 12:06
>         > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk
>         > To: Wangda Tan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>         >
>         >
>         > +1
>         >
>         > Built from YARN-3368 branch and hosted in cluster. It is pretty
> much good
>         > user experience UI.
>         > I hosted new web UI in same port as existing UI. I was able to
> experience
>         > Queue, Application and Nodes pages.
>         >
>         >
>         > Thanks & Regards
>         > Rohith Sharma K S
>         >
>         > On 1 November 2016 at 04:23, Wangda Tan <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>         >
>         > > YARN Devs,
>         > >
>         > > We propose to merge YARN-3368 (YARN next generation web UI)
> development
>         > > branch into trunk for better development, would like to hear
> your
>         > thoughts
>         > > before sending out vote mail.
>         > >
>         > > The new UI will co-exist with the old YARN UI, by default it
> is disabled.
>         > > Please refer to User documentation of the new YARN UI
>         > > <https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/YARN-3368/hadoop-yarn
>         > > -project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/
> YarnUI2.md>
>         > > for
>         > > more details.
>         > >
>         > > In addition, There’re two working-in-progress features need
> the new UI to
>         > > be merged to trunk for further development.
>         > >
>         > >   1) UI of YARN Timeline Server v2 (YARN-2928)
>         > >   2) UI of YARN ResourceManager Federation (YARN-2915).
>         > >
>         > > *Status of YARN next generation web UI*
>         > >
>         > > Completed features
>         > >
>         > >    - Cluster Overview Page
>         > >    - Scheduler page
>         > >    - Applications / Application / Application-attempts pages
>         > >    - Nodes / Node page
>         > >
>         > > Integration to YARN
>         > >
>         > >    - Hosts new web UI in RM
>         > >    - Integrates to maven build / package
>         > >
>         > > Miscs:
>         > >
>         > >    - Added dependencies to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt
>         > >    - Documented how to use it. (In hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-
>         > yarn/hadoop-
>         > >    yarn-site/src/site/markdown/YarnUI2.md)
>         > >
>         > > Major items will finish on trunk:
>         > >
>         > >    - Security support
>         > >
>         > > We have run the new UI in our internal cluster for more than 3
> months,
>         > lots
>         > > of people have tried the new UI and gave lots of valuable
> feedbacks and
>         > > reported suggestions / issues to us. We fixed many of them so
> now we
>         > > believe it is more ready for wider folks to try.
>         > >
>         > > Merge JIRA for Jenkins is: https://issues.apache.org/
>         > jira/browse/YARN-4734
>         > > .
>         > > The latest Jenkins run
>         > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4734?focusedComm
>         > > entId=15620808&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
>         > > issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15620808>
>         > > gave
>         > > +1.
>         > >
>         > > The vote will run for 7 days, ending Sun, 11/06/2016. Please
> feel free to
>         > > comment if you have any questions/doubts. I'll start with my +1
>         > (binding).
>         > >
>         > > Please share your thoughts about this.
>         > >
>         > > Thanks,
>         > > Wangda
>         > >
>         >
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to