Thanks everyone. The new YARN UI v2 has now landed on branch-2 with the
merge done with --no-ff.

We will keep monitoring this to see if any issues arise.

Special thanks to Sunil Govind, Wangda Tan and Varun Saxena for all their
help on completing this.

Details at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7169
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commit/769087288ad753ca58509ff3fe5efcc2d2b061aa

thanks
Vrushali


On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Sunil G <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Vrushali for helping to backport YARN-7170 as well.
>
> +1 from my end. tested UI against latest branch and all pages seems to
> work fine.
>
> - Sunil
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM Vrushali C <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone!
>>
>> Subru: Yes, I will back-port YARN-7170 as well.
>>
>> Will do some more sanity tests and check QA for YARN-3368_branch2 and
>> then will proceed with the merge to branch2.
>>
>> thanks
>> Vrushali
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Subramaniam V K <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we should get in YARN-7170 before we merge the UI to branch-2
>>> especially since it looks like it is ready for commit?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Subru
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Wangda Tan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Eric, thanks for updating your vote! I just committed YARN-7338
>>>>
>>>> Vrushali:
>>>>
>>>> Since the YARN-7364 is an issue needs to be fixed in trunk/branch-3.0,
>>>> I'm
>>>> preferred to merge all existing JIRAs to branch-2 first and backport
>>>> YARN-7364 separately.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Wangda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eric Yang <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > +1 on merge when YARN-7338 is resolved.
>>>> >
>>>> > On 10/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Eric Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     Thank you
>>>> >
>>>> >     Regards,
>>>> >     Eric
>>>> >
>>>> >     From: Vrushali C <[email protected]>
>>>> >     Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM
>>>> >     To: Eric Yang <[email protected]>
>>>> >     Cc: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]>, Sunil G <
>>>> > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
>>>> > [email protected]>, Wangda Tan <[email protected]>
>>>> >     Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk
>>>> >
>>>> >     Thanks Eric, I have filed https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> > jira/browse/YARN-7338 to track this.
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]
>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> >     -1 (binding).
>>>> >
>>>> >     Ui2 does not seem to support same origin policy for cross site
>>>> > scripting prevention.
>>>> >     The following parameters has no effect for /ui2:
>>>> >
>>>> >     hadoop.http.cross-origin.enabled = true
>>>> >     yarn.resourcemanager.webapp.cross-origin.enabled = true
>>>> >
>>>> >     This is because ui2 is designed as a separate web application.
>>>> > WebFilters setup for existing resource manager doesn’t apply to the
>>>> new web
>>>> > application.
>>>> >     Please open JIRA to track the security issue and resolve the
>>>> problem
>>>> > prior to backporting this to branch-2.
>>>> >     This would minimize the risk to open up security hole in branch-2.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Thank you
>>>> >
>>>> >     Regards,
>>>> >     Eric
>>>> >
>>>> >     On 10/16/17, 1:03 PM, "Vrushali C" <[email protected]<
>>>> mailto:
>>>> > [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         We are planning to include the new YARN UI as part of 2.9
>>>> > release.  There
>>>> >         is work in progress for back-porting the UI to branch2.
>>>> >
>>>> >         Details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7169.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >         On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rohith Sharma K S <
>>>> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> >         > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         > I just noticed that my voted mail has been sent to Wangda
>>>> and
>>>> > forgotten to
>>>> >         > keep yarn-dev in cc. Its my bad:-(  I am forwarding my voted
>>>> > mail to
>>>> >         > yarn-dev.
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > Thanks & Regards
>>>> >         > Rohith Sharma K S
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> >         > From: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]<mailto:
>>>> > [email protected]>>
>>>> >         > Date: 3 November 2016 at 12:06
>>>> >         > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk
>>>> >         > To: Wangda Tan <[email protected]<mailto:wh
>>>> [email protected]>>
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > +1
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > Built from YARN-3368 branch and hosted in cluster. It is
>>>> pretty
>>>> > much good
>>>> >         > user experience UI.
>>>> >         > I hosted new web UI in same port as existing UI. I was able
>>>> to
>>>> > experience
>>>> >         > Queue, Application and Nodes pages.
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > Thanks & Regards
>>>> >         > Rohith Sharma K S
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > On 1 November 2016 at 04:23, Wangda Tan <
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> >         >
>>>> >         > > YARN Devs,
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > We propose to merge YARN-3368 (YARN next generation web
>>>> UI)
>>>> > development
>>>> >         > > branch into trunk for better development, would like to
>>>> hear
>>>> > your
>>>> >         > thoughts
>>>> >         > > before sending out vote mail.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > The new UI will co-exist with the old YARN UI, by default
>>>> it
>>>> > is disabled.
>>>> >         > > Please refer to User documentation of the new YARN UI
>>>> >         > > <https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/YARN-3368/hadoop-
>>>> yarn
>>>> >         > > -project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/
>>>> > YarnUI2.md>
>>>> >         > > for
>>>> >         > > more details.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > In addition, There’re two working-in-progress features
>>>> need
>>>> > the new UI to
>>>> >         > > be merged to trunk for further development.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > >   1) UI of YARN Timeline Server v2 (YARN-2928)
>>>> >         > >   2) UI of YARN ResourceManager Federation (YARN-2915).
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > *Status of YARN next generation web UI*
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Completed features
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > >    - Cluster Overview Page
>>>> >         > >    - Scheduler page
>>>> >         > >    - Applications / Application / Application-attempts
>>>> pages
>>>> >         > >    - Nodes / Node page
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Integration to YARN
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > >    - Hosts new web UI in RM
>>>> >         > >    - Integrates to maven build / package
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Miscs:
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > >    - Added dependencies to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt
>>>> >         > >    - Documented how to use it. (In
>>>> hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-
>>>> >         > yarn/hadoop-
>>>> >         > >    yarn-site/src/site/markdown/YarnUI2.md)
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Major items will finish on trunk:
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > >    - Security support
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > We have run the new UI in our internal cluster for more
>>>> than 3
>>>> > months,
>>>> >         > lots
>>>> >         > > of people have tried the new UI and gave lots of valuable
>>>> > feedbacks and
>>>> >         > > reported suggestions / issues to us. We fixed many of
>>>> them so
>>>> > now we
>>>> >         > > believe it is more ready for wider folks to try.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Merge JIRA for Jenkins is: https://issues.apache.org/
>>>> >         > jira/browse/YARN-4734
>>>> >         > > .
>>>> >         > > The latest Jenkins run
>>>> >         > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4734?
>>>> focusedComm
>>>> >         > > entId=15620808&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
>>>> >         > > issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15620808>
>>>> >         > > gave
>>>> >         > > +1.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > The vote will run for 7 days, ending Sun, 11/06/2016.
>>>> Please
>>>> > feel free to
>>>> >         > > comment if you have any questions/doubts. I'll start with
>>>> my +1
>>>> >         > (binding).
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Please share your thoughts about this.
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         > > Thanks,
>>>> >         > > Wangda
>>>> >         > >
>>>> >         >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to