Thanks everyone! Subru: Yes, I will back-port YARN-7170 as well.
Will do some more sanity tests and check QA for YARN-3368_branch2 and then will proceed with the merge to branch2. thanks Vrushali On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Subramaniam V K <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should get in YARN-7170 before we merge the UI to branch-2 > especially since it looks like it is ready for commit? > > Thanks, > Subru > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Wangda Tan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Eric, thanks for updating your vote! I just committed YARN-7338 >> >> Vrushali: >> >> Since the YARN-7364 is an issue needs to be fixed in trunk/branch-3.0, I'm >> preferred to merge all existing JIRAs to branch-2 first and backport >> YARN-7364 separately. >> >> Thanks, >> Wangda >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 on merge when YARN-7338 is resolved. >> > >> > On 10/16/17, 3:33 PM, "Eric Yang" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> > Regards, >> > Eric >> > >> > From: Vrushali C <[email protected]> >> > Date: Monday, October 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM >> > To: Eric Yang <[email protected]> >> > Cc: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]>, Sunil G < >> > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" < >> > [email protected]>, Wangda Tan <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk >> > >> > Thanks Eric, I have filed https://issues.apache.org/ >> > jira/browse/YARN-7338 to track this. >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > -1 (binding). >> > >> > Ui2 does not seem to support same origin policy for cross site >> > scripting prevention. >> > The following parameters has no effect for /ui2: >> > >> > hadoop.http.cross-origin.enabled = true >> > yarn.resourcemanager.webapp.cross-origin.enabled = true >> > >> > This is because ui2 is designed as a separate web application. >> > WebFilters setup for existing resource manager doesn’t apply to the new >> web >> > application. >> > Please open JIRA to track the security issue and resolve the problem >> > prior to backporting this to branch-2. >> > This would minimize the risk to open up security hole in branch-2. >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> > Regards, >> > Eric >> > >> > On 10/16/17, 1:03 PM, "Vrushali C" <[email protected]<mailto: >> > [email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > We are planning to include the new YARN UI as part of 2.9 >> > release. There >> > is work in progress for back-porting the UI to branch2. >> > >> > Details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7169. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rohith Sharma K S < >> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > I just noticed that my voted mail has been sent to Wangda and >> > forgotten to >> > > keep yarn-dev in cc. Its my bad:-( I am forwarding my voted >> > mail to >> > > yarn-dev. >> > > >> > > Thanks & Regards >> > > Rohith Sharma K S >> > > >> > > >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > > From: Rohith Sharma K S <[email protected]<mailto: >> > [email protected]>> >> > > Date: 3 November 2016 at 12:06 >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge YARN-3368 (new web UI) to trunk >> > > To: Wangda Tan <[email protected]<mailto:wh >> [email protected]>> >> > > >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > Built from YARN-3368 branch and hosted in cluster. It is >> pretty >> > much good >> > > user experience UI. >> > > I hosted new web UI in same port as existing UI. I was able to >> > experience >> > > Queue, Application and Nodes pages. >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks & Regards >> > > Rohith Sharma K S >> > > >> > > On 1 November 2016 at 04:23, Wangda Tan <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > > >> > > > YARN Devs, >> > > > >> > > > We propose to merge YARN-3368 (YARN next generation web UI) >> > development >> > > > branch into trunk for better development, would like to hear >> > your >> > > thoughts >> > > > before sending out vote mail. >> > > > >> > > > The new UI will co-exist with the old YARN UI, by default it >> > is disabled. >> > > > Please refer to User documentation of the new YARN UI >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/had >> oop/blob/YARN-3368/hadoop-yarn >> > > > -project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/src/site/markdown/ >> > YarnUI2.md> >> > > > for >> > > > more details. >> > > > >> > > > In addition, There’re two working-in-progress features need >> > the new UI to >> > > > be merged to trunk for further development. >> > > > >> > > > 1) UI of YARN Timeline Server v2 (YARN-2928) >> > > > 2) UI of YARN ResourceManager Federation (YARN-2915). >> > > > >> > > > *Status of YARN next generation web UI* >> > > > >> > > > Completed features >> > > > >> > > > - Cluster Overview Page >> > > > - Scheduler page >> > > > - Applications / Application / Application-attempts pages >> > > > - Nodes / Node page >> > > > >> > > > Integration to YARN >> > > > >> > > > - Hosts new web UI in RM >> > > > - Integrates to maven build / package >> > > > >> > > > Miscs: >> > > > >> > > > - Added dependencies to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt >> > > > - Documented how to use it. (In >> hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop- >> > > yarn/hadoop- >> > > > yarn-site/src/site/markdown/YarnUI2.md) >> > > > >> > > > Major items will finish on trunk: >> > > > >> > > > - Security support >> > > > >> > > > We have run the new UI in our internal cluster for more >> than 3 >> > months, >> > > lots >> > > > of people have tried the new UI and gave lots of valuable >> > feedbacks and >> > > > reported suggestions / issues to us. We fixed many of them >> so >> > now we >> > > > believe it is more ready for wider folks to try. >> > > > >> > > > Merge JIRA for Jenkins is: https://issues.apache.org/ >> > > jira/browse/YARN-4734 >> > > > . >> > > > The latest Jenkins run >> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jir >> a/browse/YARN-4734?focusedComm >> > > > entId=15620808&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system. >> > > > issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15620808> >> > > > gave >> > > > +1. >> > > > >> > > > The vote will run for 7 days, ending Sun, 11/06/2016. Please >> > feel free to >> > > > comment if you have any questions/doubts. I'll start with >> my +1 >> > > (binding). >> > > > >> > > > Please share your thoughts about this. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Wangda >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
