[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16206297#comment-16206297
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4511:
----------------------------------

Thanks [~haibo.chen] for the explanation.

bq. I am thinking of decoupling allocationInThisHeart from node heartbeat by 
renaming it to resourcesOfContainersPendingLaunch and update it in 
containerStarted()
method instead of resetting every node heartbeat. Let me know what you think.
Sounds good to me. 

bq. The launchedContainer should probably be renamed to allocatedContainer and 
launchedOnNode is to track whether the allocated
container is actually launched on the node. This piece code already exists. I 
can do the renaming if you are fine with it.
+1 to rename it now. 

bq. Very much for the same reason you are thinking of here, I am more inclined 
to keep OverAllocationInfo for now. I am not sure if we just have 
ResourceThresholds,
how we can keep backward compatibility in a clean way if we ever want to 
include more for NM overallocation configs. I agree we should do the 
consolidating
with resource profiles before the release, I think we can revisit this topic 
then.
Make sense if we can have a clean API/proto change before release.


> Common scheduler changes supporting scheduler-specific implementations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4511
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4511
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Haibo Chen
>         Attachments: YARN-4511-YARN-1011.00.patch, 
> YARN-4511-YARN-1011.01.patch, YARN-4511-YARN-1011.02.patch, 
> YARN-4511-YARN-1011.03.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to