[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13735564#comment-13735564
 ] 

Xuan Gong commented on YARN-899:
--------------------------------

bq.Do we need a QueueACLsManager separate from ApplicationACLsManager? I.e. 
could we just have a reference to ResourceScheduler in ApplicationACLsManager 
and check access based on the queue name there?

ResourceScheduler is in hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager package, but 
ApplicationACLsManager is in hadoop.yarn.common package, and looks like we can 
not add ResourceScheduler reference into ApplicationACLsManager.
                
> Get queue administration ACLs working
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-899
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0-beta
>            Reporter: Sandy Ryza
>            Assignee: Xuan Gong
>         Attachments: YARN-899.1.patch, YARN-899.2.patch, YARN-899.3.patch, 
> YARN-899.4.patch
>
>
> The Capacity Scheduler documents the 
> yarn.scheduler.capacity.root.<queue-path>.acl_administer_queue config option 
> for controlling who can administer a queue, but it is not hooked up to 
> anything.  The Fair Scheduler could make use of a similar option as well.  
> This is a feature-parity regression from MR1.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to