[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16836617#comment-16836617
]
Eric Payne commented on YARN-9202:
----------------------------------
[~kshukla], thanks for your explanation. I think we should go ahead with your
current approach. The current patch does not apply, however, so can you please
provide an upmerged patch?
> RM does not track nodes that are in the include list and never register
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-9202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.9.2, 3.0.3, 2.8.5
> Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
> Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9202.001.patch
>
>
> The RM state machine decides to put new or running nodes in inactive state
> only past the point of either registration or being in the exclude list. This
> does not cover the case where a node is the in the include list but never
> registers and since all state changes are based on these NodeState
> transitions, having NEW nodes be listed as inactive first may help. This
> would change the semantics of how inactiveNodes are looked at today. Another
> state addition might help this case too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]