[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16861188#comment-16861188 ]
Jim Brennan commented on YARN-9202: ----------------------------------- Thanks for the explanation [~kshukla]! The test failure looks similar to the one reported in YARN-9540. > RM does not track nodes that are in the include list and never register > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-9202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.9.2, 3.0.3, 2.8.5 > Reporter: Kuhu Shukla > Assignee: Kuhu Shukla > Priority: Major > Attachments: YARN-9202.001.patch, YARN-9202.002.patch > > > The RM state machine decides to put new or running nodes in inactive state > only past the point of either registration or being in the exclude list. This > does not cover the case where a node is the in the include list but never > registers and since all state changes are based on these NodeState > transitions, having NEW nodes be listed as inactive first may help. This > would change the semantics of how inactiveNodes are looked at today. Another > state addition might help this case too. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org