[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16861170#comment-16861170
 ] 

Kuhu Shukla commented on YARN-9202:
-----------------------------------

[~Jim_Brennan], the nodes from the inactive list (with port= -1) are thrown 
away once the actual NM registration come through and creates the new RMNode 
object. Since that is the case for any new node trying to register, we do not 
need the shutdown to running transition since the rmnode object that is in 
shutdown state is never really used so to say.

 

> RM does not track nodes that are in the include list and never register
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-9202
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9202
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.2, 3.0.3, 2.8.5
>            Reporter: Kuhu Shukla
>            Assignee: Kuhu Shukla
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-9202.001.patch, YARN-9202.002.patch
>
>
> The RM state machine decides to put new or running nodes in inactive state 
> only past the point of either registration or being in the exclude list. This 
> does not cover the case where a node is the in the include list but never 
> registers and since all state changes are based on these NodeState 
> transitions, having NEW nodes be listed as inactive first may help. This 
> would change the semantics of how inactiveNodes are looked at today. Another 
> state addition might help this case too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to