[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996776#comment-13996776
]
Jian He commented on YARN-2017:
-------------------------------
bq. Since this is original logic of SchedulerNode, I think it's better to throw
exception instead of print a irresponsible log here. Null object passed in
should be considered big problem in scheduler. And several following places in
this class.
On a second thought, user might pass in a resource request with null
capability. I would prefer not changing it. In fact, we can add many other null
checks in many places. Changed the patch back.
> Merge some of the common lib code in schedulers
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-2017
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2017
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: resourcemanager
> Reporter: Jian He
> Assignee: Jian He
> Attachments: YARN-2017.1.patch, YARN-2017.2.patch, YARN-2017.3.patch
>
>
> A bunch of same code is repeated among schedulers, e.g: between
> FicaSchedulerNode and FSSchedulerNode. It's good to merge and share them in a
> common base.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)