[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14295664#comment-14295664
]
Advertising
Anubhav Dhoot commented on YARN-3101:
-------------------------------------
YARN-2811 added the following
{noformat}
private boolean fitInMaxShare(FSQueue queue) {
if (Resources.fitsIn(queue.getResourceUsage(), queue.getMaxShare())) {
return false;
}
{noformat}
This should have been
{noformat}
if (!Resources.fitsIn(queue.getResourceUsage(), queue.getMaxShare()))
{noformat}
Because of this we would always reject reservations and hence the test was
passing
Adding a new patch that shows this via a negative test case (reservation should
not be dropped when not exceeding). This fails without the new fix.
> FairScheduler#fitInMaxShare was added to validate reservations but it does
> not consider it
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3101
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
> Reporter: Anubhav Dhoot
> Assignee: Anubhav Dhoot
> Attachments: YARN-3101.001.patch, YARN-3101.002.patch
>
>
> YARN-2811 added fitInMaxShare to validate reservations on a queue, but did
> not count it during its calculations. It also had the condition reversed so
> the test was still passing because both cancelled each other.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)