[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14299428#comment-14299428
]
Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-3101:
----------------------------------
In that case it sounds like the behavior is that we can go one container over
the max resources. While this might be worth changing in a separate JIRA, we
should maintain that behavior with the reservations.
> FairScheduler#fitInMaxShare was added to validate reservations but it does
> not consider it
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-3101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3101
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fairscheduler
> Reporter: Anubhav Dhoot
> Assignee: Anubhav Dhoot
> Attachments: YARN-3101-Siqi.v1.patch, YARN-3101-Siqi.v2.patch,
> YARN-3101.001.patch, YARN-3101.002.patch
>
>
> YARN-2811 added fitInMaxShare to validate reservations on a queue, but did
> not count it during its calculations. It also had the condition reversed so
> the test was still passing because both cancelled each other.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)