[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634497#comment-14634497
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-3026:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch |  16m 24s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is 
healthy. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | @author |   0m  0s | The patch does not contain any 
@author tags. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | tests included |   0m  0s | The patch appears to 
include 5 new or modified test files. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | javac |   7m 46s | There were no new javac warning 
messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | javadoc |   9m 36s | There were no new javadoc 
warning messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | release audit |   0m 24s | The applied patch does 
not increase the total number of release audit warnings. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | checkstyle |   0m 48s | The applied patch generated  
37 new checkstyle issues (total was 394, now 357). |
| {color:red}-1{color} | whitespace |   1m 20s | The patch has 6  line(s) that 
end in whitespace. Use git apply --whitespace=fix. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | install |   1m 25s | mvn install still works. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | eclipse:eclipse |   0m 34s | The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | findbugs |   1m 25s | The patch does not introduce 
any new Findbugs (version 3.0.0) warnings. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | yarn tests |  61m 44s | Tests failed in 
hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager. |
| | | 101m 31s | |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Timed out tests | 
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity.TestNodeLabelContainerAllocation
 |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12746226/YARN-3026.3.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / 773c670 |
| checkstyle |  
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8591/artifact/patchprocess/diffcheckstylehadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8591/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace.txt
 |
| hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager test log | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8591/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager.txt
 |
| Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8591/testReport/ |
| Java | 1.7.0_55 |
| uname | Linux asf902.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/8591/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> Move application-specific container allocation logic from LeafQueue to 
> FiCaSchedulerApp
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3026
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3026
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: capacityscheduler
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>         Attachments: YARN-3026.1.patch, YARN-3026.2.patch, YARN-3026.3.patch
>
>
> Have a discussion with [~vinodkv] and [~jianhe]: 
> In existing Capacity Scheduler, all allocation logics of and under LeafQueue 
> are located in LeafQueue.java in implementation. To make a cleaner scope of 
> LeafQueue, we'd better move some of them to FiCaSchedulerApp.
> Ideal scope of LeafQueue should be: when a LeafQueue receives some resources 
> from ParentQueue (like 15% of cluster resource), and it distributes resources 
> to children apps, and it should be agnostic to internal logic of children 
> apps (like delayed-scheduling, etc.). IAW, LeafQueue shouldn't decide how 
> application allocating container from given resources.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to