On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:02:57PM +0200, Lukas Ocilka wrote: > OK, as there was no decision so far and the discussion has > apparently died although it's blocking the development, *I suggest > to use RSpec* for all the new tests. There are just a few test in, > e.g., Services Manager that might need partial rewriting because > they use Test::Unit but that's it. > > Is anybody against this suggestion? Please write also if you agree with it.
Although I have little actual experience (I only have a rather messy Test::Unit suite in ruby-dbus), I am for: RSpec From David's arguments, the points important to me are - superior ability to structure the specs - wide acceptance in the community -- Martin Vidner, Cloud & Systems Management Team http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
