It is interesting to note that this genuine comrades did not remind us of genuine debates when an interview with Anele Mdaka was distributed here, and others did not say that they will buy newspapers, nevertheless I congratulate comrades who say that we must reinforce that the ANC stands for the total emancipation of our people(all people).
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Makhetha, Mzukisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Dear Comrades > > > > I have observe with great disappointment how there are elements who are > trying to devalue this important platform of discussion by either being out > of context or try to reason the without reason. LETS create a debate. The > task that we are faced with in this epoch of shikota's general confusion is > that we need to remind the general public of: > > 1. What is the MDM > > 2. What is the ANC, SACP, SANCO and COSATU. > > 3. The stages of revolution > > 4. Full resolutions of Umrogoro conference > > > > With the above clearly being explained to the masses we will be able to > show how the cope is lost, not in the interest of ensuring that the > resources and wealth of the country. What the public wants to hear is not > the movement defending we must be accelerating in explaining the resolutions > of Polokwane, why I started with the 4 items was to ensure that Cdes don't > mobile masses with a defensive tone but with that one of knowing how best > the ANC can serve the country under the leadership of JZ. And again just to > highlight that so that we able to mobilise for next year general elections. > The real treat that our movement face is the laziness of Cdes not wanting > to exploit Sundays as great mobilising days but then as great chilling days. > Our capability to mobilise beyond expectations is at its greatest test but > yet we are not also exploiting the lack of policy of other parties including > cope. > > > > Mzukisi Makhetha > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Mpho Tabane > *Sent:* 18 November 2008 02:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Malema, why Malema? > > > > Comrade > > If we want to read this article we will go to the newspapers please dont > use this forum to become newspaper re-distributors centre > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Smile Ndlovu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This week the Sunday Times reported in its business section on how > companies with close links to Industrial Development Corporation > chairman, Wendy Luhabe, had benefitted from loans from the IDC as well > as a BEE deal. The article, headed "Lolly rolls in for Luhabe," > reported > that according to the IDC's 2008 annual report the parastatal had > approved two R50m loans to the Women's Private Equity Fund - which > Luhabe had founded. > > Another company in which Luhabe had an interest, Wiphold, had also > apparently benefitted when "IDS subsidiary, Hans Merensky Holdings," > effectively handed over 26% of its wood business to black empowerment > partners last year. > > Luhabe denied any conflict of interest, telling the newspaper that > "When > there is a transaction from Wiphold or the Women's Fund, management > will > bring that to my attention. The IDC board has a procedure that makes > sure that directors who may be involved in a transaction that has to > be > decided by the board do not get the paperwork for that transaction and > they do not participate in the decision- making on that transaction." > > In its response to the Sunday Times report COSATU stated that "It is > simply not good enough for [Luhabe] to say that she had recused > herself > from board meetings that made decisions involving her companies. It > should be illegal for anyone who has a position in a Development > Finance > Institution - or any company in which they have a interest - to > receive > any contracts, tenders or any other form of financial benefit from > that > body. No-one must be allowed to be on a board that allocates money to > their own companies." > > The SACP also expressed its outrage: "People who serve in public > institutions" it noted in a statement, "must not behave like parasites > on the resources that are supposed to benefit the ordinary workers and > the poor of our country... These Luhabe transactions are a further > expression of the extent to which BEE has been captured by narrow > parasitic elite, using the state for its own self-enrichment." > > There is a saying that a man who wants to beat a dog will always find > a > stick. And clearly Luhabe has made herself a target by backing her > husband, former Gauteng Premier Mbhazima Shilowa, and his efforts to > get > an ANC breakaway movement off the ground. This story seems to be a > slightly more robust stick than that initially picked up by the ANC > Youth League several days ago but the motive is similar. > > What is rather curious though is that the IDC's involvement with the > WPEF has been known for a rather long time. The Fund was launched in > mid > February 2003. The Sunday Times even reported on it in the Business > Times under the heading "Sisters are knuckling down and doing it for > themselves." Almost all the facts now causing controversy were > reported > on then. > > Since Malema arrived, cleaners are working hard > > > Confidentiality & Disclaimer > This e-mail transmission, including the attachments (hereinafter > collectively referred to as this "e-mail") contains information that is > confidential and subject to legal privilege intended only for use by the > individual or entity to which it is originally addressed. Access by > anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient or a > person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, > be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and you must > delete this e-mail in its entirety immediately. Any unauthorised > disclosure, dissemination, reliance, use, interception, alteration, > tampering or any other form of corruption of this e-mail or any part > hereof is strictly forbidden. E-mails cannot be guaranteed to be secure > or free of errors or viruses. As such, we advise you to carry out your > own virus checks, as neither this entity nor the transmitter accept any > liability whatsoever, arising from this e-mail or for any consequence of > its use or storage. No stated, tacit or implied view, opinion, advice or > position of the transmitter necessarily represents that of this entity. > If verification of this e-mail is required, please request a hard-copy > version on an official letterhead of this entity. Copyright in this > e-mail is and remains vested in this entity and/or in the transmitter. > This entity fully reserves the right, without notice, to monitor > outgoing and incoming e-mail and other transmissions or communications > on, in, through or by means of its e-mail and telecommunications > systems. > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [EMAIL PROTECTED] . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
