Comrade Vilakazi,

This is the kind of responses i expect to receive from Comrades

1. Granted, that might be a shoddy work from the reporter, but we must
also understand that journalist do not have to prove anything, but
report on a mere allegations received (Just like the article on the
first page of Sunday Time about the SAA CEO, nothing was proven, it was
just allegations)

2. Considering that a further is investigation warranted, the
allegation raised so far a very serious and indicate a possible abuse of
power by not only Wendy but the entire board

3. In SA we have the King 11-Corporate Governance, which governs the
functions and duties of the directors, BOD, Audit Committee, etc,  which
its compliance is compulsory to listed companies, public entities and
banks

4. To me the test of whether Wendy abused his power should be the
following

- Conflict of interest- (Did she recuse herself in any discussions
relating to her companies and its loan applications)

- Disclosure- To the other board members, disclosure to AFS off IDC,
disclosure to the relevant political authority, the Treasury department,
especially if it was a non interest yielding loan) 

- Consistency- What other applicants (for loans) received non interest
yielding loan, other than her companies

-Competitive- Whether other entities were given an equal opportunity as
her company to purchase a state in the IDC subsidiary Hans Merensky
Holdings


5. Im so disappointed with the SA media, that seems to be reluctant to
follow the allegation through, like they did with the allegations
surrounding Balfour. They only interested in following Julius Malema so
that they can twist any things that he said.

Regards
Kodlana 


>>> "Mduduzi H Vilakazi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/18/2008 3:08 PM
>>>
Cde Smile.
 
Can you assist us with any prescripts that prevents board members from
participating in the financial transactions as reported by Sunday
Times.
I found the story very interesting but also lacking the correct
information that will assist us laymen to arrive at a conclusion as to
whether Luhabe abused office or not.
 
To me that was poor journalism and warrants our further investigation
beyond the limited work done by the reporter. I have tried in vain to
find any prescripts that governs IDC and would be glad if someone
assists us. We need to ensure that we safeguard our country from
mal-administration or capitalist corrupt activities.
 
We also need to be careful because if one will dig too much into
businesses and enterprises, we might collapse the structures because
it
is an open secret that most of our leaders are in business through
questionable means. Its either they got business from structures where
they are stewards or they were provided business shares by
questionable
figures.
 
Let us engage, Macabane.
 


>>> "Smile Ndlovu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18/11/2008 14:06 >>>


This week the Sunday Times reported in its business section on how
companies with close links to Industrial Development Corporation
chairman, Wendy Luhabe, had benefitted from loans from the IDC as well
as a BEE deal. The article, headed "Lolly rolls in for Luhabe,"
reported
that according to the IDC's 2008 annual report the parastatal had
approved two R50m loans to the Women's Private Equity Fund - which
Luhabe had founded. 

Another company in which Luhabe had an interest, Wiphold, had also
apparently benefitted when "IDS subsidiary, Hans Merensky Holdings,"
effectively handed over 26% of its wood business to black empowerment
partners last year. 

Luhabe denied any conflict of interest, telling the newspaper that
"When
there is a transaction from Wiphold or the Women's Fund, management
will
bring that to my attention. The IDC board has a procedure that makes
sure that directors who may be involved in a transaction that has to
be
decided by the board do not get the paperwork for that transaction and
they do not participate in the decision- making on that transaction."

In its response to the Sunday Times report COSATU stated that "It is
simply not good enough for [Luhabe] to say that she had recused
herself
from board meetings that made decisions involving her companies. It
should be illegal for anyone who has a position in a Development
Finance
Institution - or any company in which they have a interest - to
receive
any contracts, tenders or any other form of financial benefit from
that
body. No-one must be allowed to be on a board that allocates money to
their own companies." 

The SACP also expressed its outrage: "People who serve in public
institutions" it noted in a statement, "must not behave like parasites
on the resources that are supposed to benefit the ordinary workers and
the poor of our country... These Luhabe transactions are a further
expression of the extent to which BEE has been captured by narrow
parasitic elite, using the state for its own self-enrichment."

There is a saying that a man who wants to beat a dog will always find
a
stick. And clearly Luhabe has made herself a target by backing her
husband, former Gauteng Premier Mbhazima Shilowa, and his efforts to
get
an ANC breakaway movement off the ground. This story seems to be a
slightly more robust stick than that initially picked up by the ANC
Youth League several days ago but the motive is similar.  

What is rather curious though is that the IDC's involvement with the
WPEF has been known for a rather long time. The Fund was launched in
mid
February 2003. The Sunday Times even reported on it in the Business
Times under the heading "Sisters are knuckling down and doing it for
themselves." Almost all the facts now causing controversy were
reported
on then.

Since Malema arrived, cleaners are working hard 


Confidentiality & Disclaimer 
This e-mail transmission, including the attachments (hereinafter
collectively referred to as this “e-mail”) contains information
that
is
confidential and subject to legal privilege intended only for use by
the
individual or entity to which it is originally addressed. Access by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient or
a
person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended
recipient,
be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and you must
delete this e-mail in its entirety immediately. Any unauthorised
disclosure, dissemination, reliance, use, interception, alteration,
tampering or any other form of corruption of this e-mail or any part
hereof is strictly forbidden. E-mails cannot be guaranteed to be
secure
or free of errors or viruses. As such, we advise you to carry out your
own virus checks, as neither this entity nor the transmitter accept
any
liability whatsoever, arising from this e-mail or for any consequence
of
its use or storage. No stated, tacit or implied view, opinion, advice
or
position of the transmitter necessarily represents that of this
entity.
If verification of this e-mail is required, please request a hard-copy
version on an official letterhead of this entity. Copyright in this
e-mail is and remains vested in this entity and/or in the transmitter.
This entity fully reserves the right, without notice, to monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mail and other transmissions or communications
on, in, through or by means of its e-mail and telecommunications
systems.



This message and any attachments relating to official business of the
Mpumalanga Provincial Government (MPG) is proprietary to the MPG and
intended for the original addressee only.
The message may contain information that is confidential and subject
to
legal privilege. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender.

If you receive this message in error, please notify the original
sender
immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you
must not disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in
connection therewith.

The MPG cannot insure that the integrity of this communication has
been
maintained, nor that it is free of errors, viruses, interception and /
or interference. The MPG is not liable whatsoever for loss or damage
resulting from the opening of this message and / or attachments and /
or
the use of the information contained in this message and / or
attachments.



Confidentiality & Disclaimer 
This e-mail transmission, including the attachments (hereinafter
collectively referred to as this “e-mail”) contains information that is
confidential and subject to legal privilege intended only for use by the
individual or entity to which it is originally addressed. Access by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient or a
person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient,
be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and you must
delete this e-mail in its entirety immediately. Any unauthorised
disclosure, dissemination, reliance, use, interception, alteration,
tampering or any other form of corruption of this e-mail or any part
hereof is strictly forbidden. E-mails cannot be guaranteed to be secure
or free of errors or viruses. As such, we advise you to carry out your
own virus checks, as neither this entity nor the transmitter accept any
liability whatsoever, arising from this e-mail or for any consequence of
its use or storage. No stated, tacit or implied view, opinion, advice or
position of the transmitter necessarily represents that of this entity.
If verification of this e-mail is required, please request a hard-copy
version on an official letterhead of this entity. Copyright in this
e-mail is and remains vested in this entity and/or in the transmitter.
This entity fully reserves the right, without notice, to monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mail and other transmissions or communications
on, in, through or by means of its e-mail and telecommunications
systems.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] . You don't have to put anything 
in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. 
All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to