Comanda

I think you've got exactly the point I have been interested to hear comrades
raising it. Comanda I fully support your submission that our forum need to
move away from engaging in junk discussion and rather we need to sharpen our
IQ and beging to bring in fresh political engagement in our forum.

Let have issues that are organisationally and politically relevant that are
needed to be discussed in our forum.

Amandla !!!!



  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Makhetha, Mzukisi
  Sent: 18 November 2008 03:07
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] LETS DEBATE, MY ANC, MY FUTURE


  Dear Comrades



  I have observe with great disappointment how there are elements who are
trying to devalue this important platform of discussion by either being out
of context or try to reason the without reason. LETS create a debate. The
task that we are faced with in this epoch of shikota’s general confusion is
that we need to remind the general public of:

  1. What is the MDM

  2. What is the ANC, SACP, SANCO and COSATU.

  3. The stages of revolution

  4. Full resolutions of Umrogoro conference



  With the above clearly being explained to the masses we will be able to
show how the cope is lost, not in the interest of ensuring that the
resources and wealth of the country. What the public wants to hear is not
the movement defending we must be accelerating in explaining the resolutions
of Polokwane, why I started with the 4 items was to ensure that Cdes don’t
mobile masses with a defensive tone but with that one of knowing how best
the ANC can serve the country under the leadership of JZ. And again just to
highlight that so that we able to mobilise for next year general elections.
The real treat that our movement face is the laziness of  Cdes not wanting
to exploit Sundays as great mobilising days but then as great chilling days.
Our capability to mobilise beyond expectations is at its greatest test but
yet we are not also exploiting the lack of policy of other parties including
cope.



  Mzukisi Makhetha






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mpho Tabane
  Sent: 18 November 2008 02:29 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Malema, why Malema?



  Comrade

  If we want to read this article we will go to the newspapers please dont
use this forum to become newspaper re-distributors centre

  On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Smile Ndlovu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



  This week the Sunday Times reported in its business section on how
  companies with close links to Industrial Development Corporation
  chairman, Wendy Luhabe, had benefitted from loans from the IDC as well
  as a BEE deal. The article, headed "Lolly rolls in for Luhabe,"
  reported
  that according to the IDC's 2008 annual report the parastatal had
  approved two R50m loans to the Women's Private Equity Fund - which
  Luhabe had founded.

  Another company in which Luhabe had an interest, Wiphold, had also
  apparently benefitted when "IDS subsidiary, Hans Merensky Holdings,"
  effectively handed over 26% of its wood business to black empowerment
  partners last year.

  Luhabe denied any conflict of interest, telling the newspaper that
  "When
  there is a transaction from Wiphold or the Women's Fund, management
  will
  bring that to my attention. The IDC board has a procedure that makes
  sure that directors who may be involved in a transaction that has to
  be
  decided by the board do not get the paperwork for that transaction and
  they do not participate in the decision- making on that transaction."

  In its response to the Sunday Times report COSATU stated that "It is
  simply not good enough for [Luhabe] to say that she had recused
  herself
  from board meetings that made decisions involving her companies. It
  should be illegal for anyone who has a position in a Development
  Finance
  Institution - or any company in which they have a interest - to
  receive
  any contracts, tenders or any other form of financial benefit from
  that
  body. No-one must be allowed to be on a board that allocates money to
  their own companies."

  The SACP also expressed its outrage: "People who serve in public
  institutions" it noted in a statement, "must not behave like parasites
  on the resources that are supposed to benefit the ordinary workers and
  the poor of our country... These Luhabe transactions are a further
  expression of the extent to which BEE has been captured by narrow
  parasitic elite, using the state for its own self-enrichment."

  There is a saying that a man who wants to beat a dog will always find
  a
  stick. And clearly Luhabe has made herself a target by backing her
  husband, former Gauteng Premier Mbhazima Shilowa, and his efforts to
  get
  an ANC breakaway movement off the ground. This story seems to be a
  slightly more robust stick than that initially picked up by the ANC
  Youth League several days ago but the motive is similar.

  What is rather curious though is that the IDC's involvement with the
  WPEF has been known for a rather long time. The Fund was launched in
  mid
  February 2003. The Sunday Times even reported on it in the Business
  Times under the heading "Sisters are knuckling down and doing it for
  themselves." Almost all the facts now causing controversy were
  reported
  on then.

  Since Malema arrived, cleaners are working hard


  Confidentiality & Disclaimer
  This e-mail transmission, including the attachments (hereinafter
  collectively referred to as this "e-mail") contains information that is
  confidential and subject to legal privilege intended only for use by the
  individual or entity to which it is originally addressed. Access by
  anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient or a
  person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient,
  be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and you must
  delete this e-mail in its entirety immediately. Any unauthorised
  disclosure, dissemination, reliance, use, interception, alteration,
  tampering or any other form of corruption of this e-mail or any part
  hereof is strictly forbidden. E-mails cannot be guaranteed to be secure
  or free of errors or viruses. As such, we advise you to carry out your
  own virus checks, as neither this entity nor the transmitter accept any
  liability whatsoever, arising from this e-mail or for any consequence of
  its use or storage. No stated, tacit or implied view, opinion, advice or
  position of the transmitter necessarily represents that of this entity.
  If verification of this e-mail is required, please request a hard-copy
  version on an official letterhead of this entity. Copyright in this
  e-mail is and remains vested in this entity and/or in the transmitter.
  This entity fully reserves the right, without notice, to monitor
  outgoing and incoming e-mail and other transmissions or communications
  on, in, through or by means of its e-mail and telecommunications
  systems.









  


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] . You don't have to put anything 
in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. 
All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to