Yes comrades mine is to say I do understand how revolutionary the GS is
and why maybe the movement deplyed him on that strategic position. He
will as in fact doing so address the in balance between the students
from the poor background and those from the rich but however comrades
when we talk of a state and its government we should be consiouse enough
in the matter of knowing and understanding what class does it serve as a
state. So it is a known factor that South Africa is a capitalist state
and so will be the government,comrades we may deploy as many as possible
communist on cabinet but if as a party we cannot address and transform
the system that made our country be a capitalist state then it doesn't
matter who and where but what matters most to my understanding are
strategies to fight capitalism and take it to the grave where it belongs
then after these issues of duties and responsibilities of GS may follow.
 
Comrades the reality of the situation here is that conflict of interest
may at any given time arise to him as a minister of the government who
operates on the capitalist state and that may lead to the point where he
will have to side with an enemy. So for me I think we should then ask
him to step down as GS sober as I am but make it clear to him on that
congress that his mandate of which he is perfoming it very well of
transforming education and training towards working class must keep on
that,then any capable comrade who will then be replacing him and other
cc members lead the agenda of transforming the systerm in this country.
Manditshaye

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thembela Gazi
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Blade 'safe from drunk dreamers', Buti
Manamela, Times


Comrades,
 
Long before the new Administration took office, I expressed concern post
Polokwane around the availability of the Party leadership that we
elected in PE at the 12th National Congress. This concern was born from
the fact that the GS was in the NEC & NWC of the ANC; National
Chairperson was now the Secretary General of our Movement - with all the
responsibilities associated with such a deployment; the then National
Deputy Chair late Cde Ncumisa Kondlo (may her soul rest in peace) was in
the NEC & NWC); and now the National Treasurer is in the NEC, an MEC and
now is the Provincial Chairperson of the ANC in the Eastern Cape; the
Deputy General Secretary is now the Deputy Transport Minister.
Several CC members are cabinet ministers. These are all demanding
fulltime positions and as an aspiring communist I am proud of the role
played by communists within the ANC in their own right as members of the
ANC. These deployments point to the kind of leadership provided by
Communists in our Movement and the general ANC membership realises this.
 
The current debate is sparked by the role of the GS within the current
Administration as Minister responsible for Higher Education and Training
a critical role for the development of the country, a key priority in
the ANC Manifesto. Cde Blade the revolutionary, an educationsist I am
sure the President could not have made a better choice into his Cabinet
for this critical portfolio.
 
Having said all that we should not close a debate on the implications of
these progressive deployments on the political and organisational state
of the SACP as an independant organisation within the Tripartite
Alliance. And when engaging in such a debate let us also not be
prisoners of our Constitution.
In as much as I agree that the Special National Congress is not an
elective gathering - I am sure that it will discuss issues related to
the Post Polokwane scenario and how those are impacting on our Party.
 
Masijule ngengxoxo,
 
Thembela. 


On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Dominic Tweedie
<[email protected]> wrote:



        Cde Clarence,
        
        You are trying to tell us that the only reason you want to have
a
        debate about the words "full time" at the Special National
Congress is
        just so that you can reaffirm your support for Cde Blade?
        
        In England they would say "Pull the other one, it's got bells
on."
        
        Maybe Ian Beddowes can explain that for you.
        
        I suspect that if you go around telling people in South Africa
that
        you want to debate the meaning of "full time" just so as to show
your
        loyalty to Blade Nzimande, then you are going to make some
people
        laugh, but if you push your luck too far, some of them might get
quite
        annoyed with you.
        
        I think you should keep your dreams to yourself in this case.
        
        Yours in struggle,
        
        Domza.
        


        On 09/11/2009, Kanego, Clarence Thete <[email protected]> wrote:
        > VC
        >
        > In am seriously disaapointed in you Domza. The questions which
are asked by
        > Comrade Mdu are as innocent as they expose the technicality of
what we
        > assertion as the YCLSA and others including yourself that Cde
Blade Nzimande
        > should and will continue as the GS of the SACP. Cde Domza it
does not
        > require any deep understanding of the Polemics or Classics of
Marx to
        > understand that the Constitution says that the postion of the
GS is a full
        > time. The question that follows then will be what are the
limitations or
        > implications of this position being fulltime whereas its
occupant holds
        > another postion that is full time as well? Cde Domza, I have
never seen any
        > of your writtings become so shallow as what you have gave as
responses. What
        > makes matters worse is that all what you have said is that the
debate should
        > not exist in the first place and I do not agree. We have been
the frontiers
        > of struggle against anyone who suppresses debates in the
movement we should
        > act like one!
        >
        > Comrades, why don't we find out as to what happened to the
People's Republic
        > of Cuba when Cde Fidel was President and General Secretary of
the Communist
        > Party of Cuba? How does the Communist Party of China handles
this matter? My
        > take is that we are not waging a constitutional struggle here,
we are waging
        > a class struggle. So the constitutionality of the matter can
be handled. Our
        > struggle for power of the state resonates well with our GS
being a minister
        > in the state. That is the angle I bring on this debate.
        > Lets debate!
        > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dominic Tweedie
        > <[email protected]>wrote:
        >
        >> Cde Mduduzi,
        >>
        >> I think that what you are indulging in is what is called
sophistry. I can
        >> happily use that word because I am sure when you were taught
how to debate
        >> you would have been taught what sophistry is.
        >>
        >> I think that this sophistry of going to Turfloop to discover
what is the
        >> meaning of "full time" has been exposed. That is never going
to be the
        >> agenda of the Special National Congress.
        >>
        >> You are trying to catch Dr Blade with a hook made of rubber.
        >>
        >> You will not succeed.
        >>
        >> Yours in struggle,
        >>
        >> Domza,
        >>
        >> VC
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >> 2009/11/9 Mduduzi H Vilakazi <[email protected]>
        >>
        >>  Cde Lebese,
        >>>
        >>> I was taught how to debate and have deliberately shy away
from mentioning
        >>> time because I understood what it meant. None of my posting
has time, so
        >>> please chief, do not debate from the premise of your too
forward mind.
        >>>
        >>> If anyone can be able to let me know what fulltime mean as
enshrined (not
        >>> in any constitution but) in the constitution of the SACP. I
still remain
        >>> that the debate to me is not on changing the GS. It is
rather on our
        >>> understanding of fulltime.
        >>>
        >>> So, if your wondering mind provides you with wrong
interpretation of my
        >>> posting, then do not attribute such statements or paranoia
to me. I
        >>> remain
        >>> with the belief that should comrade blade be multi tasking
and not be
        >>> fulltime as an official then he is unconstitutionally
occupying that
        >>> office.
        >>>
        >>> I therefore request anyone who can interpret the
constitution different
        >>> from my interpretation to provide such. I will not change my
views on
        >>> peoples love for labelling. I have undergone many
frustrating moments and
        >>> I
        >>> am able to stand my ground until convinced otherwise. Why
dont comrades
        >>> learn to debate issues not persons.
        >>>
        >>> As it stands, the constitution should be amended or comrade
Blade be
        >>> replaced. We should not be so irrational by ignoring the
meaning of
        >>> constitutional implications in this regard.
        >>>
        >>> I remain.
        >>>
        >>>
        >>>
        >>> >>> "Lebese OE" <[email protected]> 09/11/2009 15:55 >>>
        >>>
        >>> Cdes,
        >>>
        >>> Let us try to remind cde Mdu that;
        >>>
        >>> 1.       The GS is not an employee of some company that has
its office
        >>> hours from 8 - 4. For your benefit the extract says: *The
General
        >>> Secretary shall be the leading National Office Bearer of the
SACP and a*
        >>> *full-time official* *under conditions of service determined
by the CC**.
        >>> The General Secretary shall be an ex officio member of all
party
        >>> structures **(Now this does not say 8 - 4 to me and am sure
to you too)**
        >>> .*
        >>>
        >>> 2.       From time to time we will need to make decisions
based on
        >>> conditions at any given time. We need not read our
Constitution as if we
        >>> are
        >>> lawyers and it is some kind of Legislation.
        >>>
        >>> 3.       The constitution is not meant to block and delay us
in achieving
        >>> our strategic objectives.
        >>>
        >>> 4.       We are a party that has a huge responsibility of
pushing the
        >>> agenda of the working class and doing '*everything in
        >>> achieving'*socialism in our lifetime.
        >>>
        >>> 5.       This is the same leadership that played an
important part in
        >>> literally forcing the wheels on the movement back in the
right track.
        >>>
        >>> 6.       Changing leadership of the Movement was just but
one of the many
        >>> things that we needed to do and there is still a lot to be
done so nobody
        >>> is
        >>> going to disturb our momentum.
        >>>
        >>> Our National leadership of YCL was spot on when it said
through our
        >>> National Secretary that the GS is going nowhere.
        >>>
        >>> We will defend and support our leadership and will not be
apologetic for
        >>> doing so.
        >>>
        >>> Oagile
        >>>
        >>>
        
        

                
        


Volkswagen of South Africa (Pty) Ltd. (Reg No. 1946/023458/07)
Chairman: Dr J Heizmann* 
Managing Director:  D Powels
Directors: M Glendinning (Sales & Marketing), S Mund* (Finance), S Macozoma, PJ 
Smith (Human Resources),  N Maliza (Corporate and Government Affairs), T du 
Plessis (Production)
German*

DISCLAIMER : Volkswagen of South Africa (Pty) Ltd 
                 
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. 
No liability shall attach whatsoever to VWSA from this communication except 
where 
the sender is acting on specific authority of VWSA, such authority being public 
record and acknowledged by VWSA by nature of the employee's functions. 
This document may in no way be photocopied, printed, scanned or electronically 
duplicated for any purposes other than that for which it was originally 
intended. 

If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please discard 
this message and notify VWSA immediately at [email protected]

VWSA's anonymous toll free ethics number is: 0800 11 53 54

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to