Cde Domza

I understand the context of your response to Cde Nqaba in relation to whether 
up-coming communists from the ranks of COPE are welcomed in this discussion 
forum.  But, are we then saying non-leftists can be allowed to participate in 
this forum for as long as it would be the task of this forum to constructively 
transform them, noting that COPE may not, in our understanding of the theory of 
NDR, be indentifiable with the progressive revolutionary ideals of the NDR.

I think Cde Nqaba is at pains to understand the relation of COPE to the broader 
interests of the masses and the working class in general, such that he proceeds 
to ask this very pointed question.  You proceed Cde Domza to quote: In short, 
the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the 
existing social and political order of things.  

Can we say that COPE agrees and stands comfortably by the quote you mention, 
such that we are comfortable amongs them too?

I have noted you well defined response anyway.  

Amandla!!



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dominic Tweedie 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:28 AM
  Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] The Changing Times Online


  Dear Cde Nqaba,

  Concerning this forum, let me repeat again: there is no barrier, except when 
it comes to spam. Spammers are banned.

  In terms of the Communist University "contact sessions" (study circles), 
there is no questionnaire; there is no interrogation, vetting or interview; 
there are no preconceived exclusions. It is not impossible that the comrades 
might one day rise up in a fury and throw somebody out, but it has never 
happened to date.

  I would say that the communists must be comfortable among the people, and 
they must be accustomed to dialogue with all kinds of people, and they need to 
practice, so that they become able to make headway in the presence of all sorts 
of people.

  Communism is not a sect. It is not a cult for initiates only. Communism is 
the natural way of thought for human beings, far more so than capitalism, for 
example.

  Here are a few words from the "Communist Manifesto":

  "In what relation do the Communists stand to the proletarians as a whole? The 
Communists do not form a separate party opposed to the other working-class 
parties.

  "They have no interests separate and apart from those of the proletariat as a 
whole.

  "They do not set up any sectarian principles of their own, by which to shape 
and mold the proletarian movement."


  "In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement 
against the existing social and political order of things.

  "In all these movements, they bring to the front, as the leading question in 
each, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the 
time.
  "Finally, they labor everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic 
parties of all countries." 

  Domza, 

  VC and Student.



  Nqaba Bhanga wrote: 
Cde Dominic ,

I would like to ask whether learning communist from COPE welcomed to, forums of 
discussion in the same understanding of MDC and Zanu-PF

  Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]> 2009/12/10 06:47 AM >>>
        The trouble with this contribution from Frank Talk is that it walks away
from the strong lights of the political stage, towards the endless darkness
of conspiracy.

What is "predictable", to use Frank's chosen word, and what was indeed
predicted by Lenin among others, is that the trade union movement will, by
itself, only produce a reformist political movement and not a revolutionary
one. It is not that it "can be" so, as Frank Talk puts it, but that it is
always going to be so.

In "What is to be Done?" Lenin called this problem "economism". It is to
escape from "economism" that Lenin proposes a generalist party of
revolutionaries to educate, organise and mobilise the masses.

Without such a party of revolutionaries there is no possibility of anything
other than the reformist kind of socialism, which is a kind of bourgeois
state with a temporarily modified appearance, and which is what is nowadays
referred to as "social democracy".

Communists have to graduate from conspiracy theory to something else. Not
that conspiracies do not exist. "Personal agendas" and "darlings of the
Imperialists" and all the rest can be found if you look for them.

The problem is that eliminating all of the conspiracies, even if it was
possible, would not eliminate the much larger problem, which is that we
proceed from a mass consciousness that is reformist and bourgeois. We
proceed from a bourgeois society.

We communists are the ones who encourage the formation of reformist
organisations of the working classes and of other self-defined masses, even
when they do not spontaneously appear. We do not expect them to be
spontaneously communist. It is no use to blame a trade union movement for
being reformist, and especially useless to do so when there is no dedicated
revolutionary party present, as in Zimbabwe.

Both Frank and Mlilo seem to think that the communists could, by being
honest and pure of mind, and by having a smart "analysis", naturally lead
the masses. This is as mistake. More than a state of mind, leadership is a
piece of work. Cleverness and will-power are not enough.

Educating, organising and mobilising is hard, grinding work. Also, from the
start, you must love the masses, who in Zimbabwe are not only workers but
also peasants, because at the start they are not your converts, and you are
not a missionary, but you are hopefully a revolutionary who wants freedom
(the free development of each that is the condition for the free development
of all).

You can't love the masses and want them to be free if you think of them as
fools or sellouts (if, in other words, you cannot trust them). This is why
conspiracy theory is a handicap for communists. Not because there are no
conspirators, but because the existence or otherwise of conspirators is
beside the main revolutionary point.

Hunting for conspirators is a diversion, Frank, and by the way, the reason
Cde Mlilo is here at all is because he walked into our Communist University
session one day in the SACP boardroom in COSATU House and introduced
himself. He sought us, and when he found us, we welcomed him, as we had
welcomed the other MDC crowd before him, and as we would have welcomed
Zanu-PF as well if they had come (but during six years to date, Zanu-PF
never did come, or even send a message).

The Communist University is not for perfect communists but for ordinary
people who are imperfect in all sorts of ways, and where we are all of us,
without any exceptions, students.

Domza

Student.




2009/12/8 frank talk <[email protected]>

  


  __________ NOD32 4674 (20091209) Information __________

  This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
  http://www.eset.com


  -- 
  You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
  Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to 
this message.
  You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . 
You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to