'Do not look where you fell, but where you slipped'
*RANJENI MUNUSAMY: COMMENT* - Oct 25 2006

In his political report to the African National Congress's (ANC) national
executive committee (NEC) earlier this month, President Thabo Mbeki warned
that strategic proposals conveyed recently by the South African Communist
Party's (SACP) Blade Nzimande would result in the "destruction of the ANC
and the rest of the democratic movement".

Considering the poisoned atmosphere, it is only natural that the president
would worry about the "destruction" of the ANC and the democratic movement.

But how did we get here?

A proverb of the Vai people of Liberia advises how to determine the source
of trouble: "Do not look where you fell, but where you slipped."

In 1994, Mbeki, then ANC deputy president, authored an internal party
document titled *From Resistance to Reconstruction: Tasks of the ANC in the
New Epoch of the Democratic Transformation -- Unmandated Reflections*.

Mbeki said "forces" would try to "destroy the ANC from within … [and]
create contradictions and conflict between the ANC and other formations in
the democratic movement".

He warned that the objective of these forces would be "splitting the ANC
around the issue of leadership". Opposition forces would attempt to break
the tripartite alliance by encouraging the SACP to project itself publicly
as the "left conscience" and the Congress of South African Trade Unions
(Cosatu) would be encouraged to project the pursuit of political and
socio-economic objectives different from those the ANC had set itself as a
governing party, Mbeki wrote.

"Change also demands that the ANC and the democratic movement as a whole
should be able to shed some of its 'members' regardless of how this might be
exploited by our opponents to discredit the movement."

*Unmandated Reflections* remained like a dirty family secret in the
privileged possession of a few senior ANC leaders who feared its release
would cause outrage in the ranks of the alliance. Those who did read it at
the time were dumbfounded by the grave predictions.

 CONTINUES BELOW


Looking back now, it is almost eerie how the president was able to script
the future. Does our president have psychic powers or is it possible that
some in the ANC knew that the trajectory they were charting would result in
the schism we now find ourselves in?

The course of events -- perhaps not all related -- over the next 11 years
provides the answer as to where we "slipped".

In 1995 we saw the fall from grace of iconic ANC leaders Winnie
Madikizela-Mandela, Allan Boesak and Bantu Holomisa. The ANC fumbled in
response, as it continues to do today.

The government's adoption of the growth, employment and redistribution
(Gear) macroeconomic policy in 1996 saw the rupture with organised labour
and the SACP.

That year also saw ANC secretary general Cyril Ramaphosa, who was
outmanoeuvred for the position of Nelson Mandela's deputy in 1994, quitting
politics for business.

In 1997, despite the skirmishes over Gear, Nzimande, at the time the SACP's
chairperson, said ahead of the ANC's 50th national conference that the party
did "not want the conference to degenerate into a war over Gear" and was
"approaching the meeting in a spirit of unity".

A constitutional task team under the national conference preparatory
committee submitted the following constitutional amendment for adoption at
the Mafikeng congress: "The ANC president shall be the state president when
the ANC has the parliamentary majority. The provincial chairperson shall be
the provincial premier in cases where the ANC enjoys a majority in the
provincial legislature. The coincidence of the ANC presidency with the state
presidency and provincial chairmanship with premiership should be phased in
from April 1999."

Despite the proposed amendment being viewed generally as harmless and being
canvassed in ANC structures, it was never formally put to the conference and
therefore not adopted. The reason was never explained.

Mbeki and Jacob Zuma were elected ANC president and deputy president
respectively at the conference.

Addressing Cosatu's central committee in 1998, Mbeki said: "We must not fall
victim to the easy temptation to label one another as this or that school of
thought, and thus close the dialogue among ourselves."

But when he addressed the SACP congress later that year, the gloves came
off: "Most remarkably, the SACP believes that we of the ANC represent this
'most serious threat'. Evidently, we having resorted to a call which
constitutes what your documents describe with self-assured and superior
sarcasm as a 'bureaucratic closing of ranks' in the face of an imagined
rather than a real counter-revolutionary threat … We must not allow the
situation such that we engage in fake revolutionary posturing so that our
mass base … accepts charlatans, who promise everything that is good, while
we all know that these confidence tricksters are telling the masses a lie."

Also in that year, Tokyo Sexwale resigned as premier of Gauteng.

In the run-up to the 1999 election, the ANC's failure to secure outright
majority in KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape provinces saw fervent
horse-trading for power-sharing agreements. The failure to strike a deal
with Inkatha Freedom Party president Mangosuthu Buthelezi over the
premiership of KwaZulu-Natal led to Zuma being appointed deputy president of
South Africa.

The year 2000 was a nightmare for the ANC, having to navigate a minefield of
controversies over its ridiculous approach to the crisis in Zimbabwe,
international outrage over Mbeki's questioning of the causal link between
HIV and Aids and the allegations of irregularities in the arms deal. The
national general conference in Port Elizabeth that year, however, pioneered
a novel concept of the "new person", roughly described as a highly skilled,
disciplined intellectual -- the prototype of the new-age ANC cadre. The
old-guard "comrade" was put out to pasture.

At an NEC meeting in October that year, Mbeki roasted Nzimande for saying at
the Cosatu congress that the scientific view that HIV causes Aids should be
accepted. This opened the floodgates for other members of the NEC to tear
into Nzimande -- as they did earlier this month.

But it was in 2001 that all hell broke loose, beginning with a bang when an
explosive letter Madikizela-Mandela wrote to Zuma complaining about Mbeki
was leaked to the media. Media houses were awash with rumours from ANC
sources that there were two "camps" in the organisation - one around the
president and the other loosely associated with Zuma. The sources claimed
Mbeki and Zuma were barely on speaking terms.

Then came the plot allegations. Former safety and security minister Steve
Tshwete was under extreme pressure to expose a police intelligence
investigation based on information from the eccentric Mpumalanga youth
league leader James Nkambule. On April 22 2001, I wrote the following as the
*Sunday Times* lead: "An official police investigation is under way into
claims that President Thabo Mbeki is in 'physical danger' from high-profile
leaders within the ANC who are plotting to oust him."

I wrote further: "Tshwete, a close ally of Mbeki and one of the ANC's main
trouble-shooters, is heading up a [ANC] tribunal investigating, among other
things, allegations by Nkambule that the [former Mpumalanga premier
Matthews] Phosa faction has teamed up with Deputy President Jacob Zuma and
with senior business leaders against Mbeki."

Two days later, Tshwete went on national television and named Ramaphosa,
Sexwale and Phosa as the alleged plotters.

Although Zuma was not implicated, he later issued an intriguing statement
declaring he was not interested in the presidency.

The *Mail & Guardian*'s editorial on April 26 2001 read as follows: "This is
low, low stuff. It is the stuff of the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin ...
It was proceeded by weeks during which we on this newspaper heard repeated
stories of leaks to the SABC intended to embarrass Deputy President Jacob
Zuma, emanating from individuals associated with the presidency."

How easily we forget.

Under a hail of condemnation from, among others, Cosatu and the SACP, and
after the investigation concluded that the allegations were hogwash, Tshwete
recanted.

Meanwhile, the Aids controversy was escalating, with government trying to
fight off pressure to provide antiretroviral treatment to pregnant women. A
bizarre, rambling 114-page document entitled *Castro Hlongwane, Caravans,
Cats, Geese, Foot & Mouth and Statistics: HIV/Aids and the Struggle for the
Humanisation of the African* did the rounds. The document, which staunch
Mbeki defender the late Peter Mokaba claimed to have authored, declared that
antiretrovirals were poisonous and had killed, among others, former
presidential spokesperson Parks Mankahlana.

In August 2001, frustration had built up in the trade union movement over
privatisation to the point that Cosatu called a two-day national strike of
more than four million workers - more than twice the federation's formal
membership.

Another ANC document, *Through the Eye of the Needle*, warned of
"individuals who operate in the dead of the night, convening secret meetings
and speaking poorly of other members, should be exposed and isolated".

Around that time, another oddball character, Bheki Jacobs, who claimed to be
Mbeki's personal intelligence adviser, went around media houses liberally
dispensing false information about the arms deal as well as various ANC
leaders.

In March 2002, Mandela's attempt to raise his concern in the NEC about the
government's dithering on antiretroviral treatment was seen as an affront to
the ANC's leader. He was heckled as he spoke and was later ruthlessly
attacked in a treatise by the late NEC member Dumisani Makhaye -- best
described as an Mbeki fanatic.

Makhaye's pen was equally poisoned when he responded to the SACP's Jeremy
Cronin's views about the over-centralisation or "Zanufication" of power in
the ANC, calling him a "white messiah" and a "factory fault".

Addressing the ANC's policy conference in September 2002, Mbeki said: "Our
movement and its policies are also under sustained attack from domestic and
foreign left sectarian factions that claim to be the best representatives of
the workers and the poor of our country. … The issue of the offensive of
the ultra-left against our movement is also important because this
ultra-left works to implant itself within our ranks.

"It strives to abuse our internal democratic processes to advance its agenda
… We are permanently interested in increasing the size and strength of our
movement. Nevertheless, I am convinced that we must also pay particular
attention to the principle -- better fewer, but better!"

Two months later, a few weeks before Zuma was to be re-elected deputy
president at the ANC's 51st national conference in Stellenbosch, this
newspaper revealed that he was under investigation in connection with the
arms deal.

Up to this point, there was no "Jacob Zuma crisis". The crossfire, tensions,
obfuscation and calamities had nothing to do with him. The events that
followed have been hammered into our consciousness - former National
Prosecuting Agency (NPA) boss Bulelani Ngcuka's "off-the-record" briefing
with editors, his "prima facie" statement, the spy allegations, the Hefer
commission, the Schabir Shaik trial, the "hoax e-mails", the firing and
charging of Zuma, and the two trials against him.

All these resulted in the democratic forces lining up to condemn the use and
abuse of state institutions in power battles. But the ANC, as it careened
from one disturbing episode to another, remained silent, witnessing its
character and cultures being redefined.

Now, debates and power struggles rage in the ANC and the alliance structures
in an atmosphere of suspicion, fear and treachery. Journalists, editors and
analysts have chalked this up to a "camp-war" between Mbeki and Zuma and
those loyal to them. These commentators have either a puerile understanding
of issues or short memories. They should seek to expand their knowledge
beyond the events of the past three years.

Of course, recent incidents and the succession battle have inflamed
tensions, but the genesis clearly lies elsewhere.

In fact, the course of events was accurately prophesied 12 years ago. If we
are falling, it is because we began slipping a long time ago. The question
is: Who pushed us?

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to