It is claiming about 300 fps, which I take with a grain of salt. The
gear display is a but jumpy, which the gears rotating in bursts about
1 second apart. It is hard to believe that each burst involves 300
frames, but it is possible.
-wn
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:27 PM, Reese, Shawn S. wrote:
Thank for the reply Warren,
That's what I meant by direct rendering, using the graphics
acceleration.
But you say you can run OpenGL programs at a good rate. Could you
do me a favor? Can you run the "glxgears" program, and tell me the
frame rate you are getting?
With the direct rendering on an x86 with a Radeon 9250 I get 265
fps. Without direct rendering, I only get 25 fps.
With no direct rendering on a G5 PowerMac running YellowDog, using
a Radeon 9600, I get 70 fps. YellowDog doesn't support direct
rendering for the G5, or at least I can't get the drivers right.
That's what got me wondering about the PS3 graphics. If it has
pretty good fps without rendering, it may be worth it to get one
and hope YellowDog supports those drivers later. Or at least maybe
Nvidia will.
Thanks again.
_______________________________________________
yellowdog-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords>
site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
_______________________________________________
yellowdog-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general
HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'