On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Martin Gardner wrote:
I've always thought that print to pdf produced a monolith that could
never be disassembled again.
I've been having this internal dialog for at least 15 years. Every
time I think I've hit on the "best" format for storing files for
archival, my OCD addled brain gently nudges me and says, "Did you
think about... ?"
For me, there are a few important factors in deciding what format to
use (in descending order of importance):
1) Will I be able to read this file 10, 20, or 30 years from now?
2) Can I easily convert this document to another format?
3) Does it preserve the original document's format and layout?
For priority 1, plain old ASCII text is the hands down winner. If the
document doesn't contain any images, links, or formatting necessary to
preserved the integrity of the document, I save it as a text note in
Yojimbo. You'd be surprised how many documents you can get away with
storing this way.
For dealing with web pages, and keeping in mind priorities 2 and 3,
I've settled on webarchives, for basically the reason you mention.
Webarchives are the most flexible format in that if I want to convert
the document to text or pdf, it's easy to do. Going in the other
direction, not so much.
Webarchives fit in with priority 1 as well. A webarchive is just a
bundle containing an HTML file and associated graphics files. I have a
feeling I'll still be able to read HTML files in 30 years on whatever
computer I'm using.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <yojimbo-talk@barebones.com>.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List archives: <http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso>
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>