On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dne St 23. června 2010 19:49:59 Robert Jarzmik napsal(a): > > > Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > The MCxx values must be based off memory clock, not CPU core clock. > > > > > > > > This also fixes the bug where on some machines the LCD went crazy while > > > > using PCMCIA. > > > > > > That looks correct to me. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > -- > > > Robert > > > > Actually lemme rethink this ... it might still be incorrect. > > As Nicolas was the one who originally wrote that code, while he was > working for Montavista and interacting with Intel, I'd be surprised > if he didn't try finding out what the right answer is to that fixme.
Well, I might have tried, or I might not have and this simply was never revisited. But I clearly don't remember any of the context anymore. > I suspect as the fixme remained that there was no clear answer. Whatever works in practice is probably the best answer at this point. Nicolas
_______________________________________________ Zaurus-devel mailing list Zaurusfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel