On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > Dne St 23. června 2010 19:49:59 Robert Jarzmik napsal(a): >> > > Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> writes: >> > > > The MCxx values must be based off memory clock, not CPU core clock. >> > > > >> > > > This also fixes the bug where on some machines the LCD went crazy while >> > > > using PCMCIA. >> > > >> > > That looks correct to me. >> > > >> > > Reviewed-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> >> > > >> > > Cheers. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Robert >> > >> > Actually lemme rethink this ... it might still be incorrect. >> >> As Nicolas was the one who originally wrote that code, while he was >> working for Montavista and interacting with Intel, I'd be surprised >> if he didn't try finding out what the right answer is to that fixme. > > Well, I might have tried, or I might not have and this simply was never > revisited. But I clearly don't remember any of the context anymore. > >> I suspect as the fixme remained that there was no clear answer. > > Whatever works in practice is probably the best answer at this point. >
Fair enough. And this looks correct to me as well. Applied to 'fix'. _______________________________________________ Zaurus-devel mailing list Zaurus-devel@lists.linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zaurus-devel
